Hi Tomasz,
Yep, you're right. I inspected my logs again and realized that the server
does not respond with a feature var='http://jabber.org/protocol/offline'/
on disco#info.
It does however, respond with feature var='msgoffline'/
So, does that mean something useful? I guess the server does
2008/3/18, 汪方 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello
I am a student from China and I have great interests in the project
'Jingle video using iaxclient' and 'Jingle file transfer '. I want to get
contract with the mentor,Mats Bengtsson. Does anybody know his email
address? Thanks!
See CC.
--
Mvg,
hi,
hi id is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 4:36 AM, Peter Saint-Andre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The XSF has been accepted! :)
Great ;)
Just for asking if you think it makes sense or not: on the standards
ml we're discussing several mobile optimizations, and there is always
the doubt of the real figures
Fabio Forno wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 4:36 AM, Peter Saint-Andre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The XSF has been accepted! :)
Great ;)
Just for asking if you think it makes sense or not: on the standards
ml we're discussing several mobile optimizations, and there is always
the
Hello.
I'm interested in
http://wiki.jabber.org/index.php/Summer_of_Code_2008#IRC-to-MUC_bridge
When (if) you accept this project idea, let me know (by mailing me
directly or by replying to this thread).
I am also willing to discuss this project in details.
P.S. Serverless (Link-Local) IM
When (if) you accept this project idea, let me know (by mailing me directly
or by replying to this thread).
AFAIK, we don't 'accept' project ideas, we just propose them. It's
left as a task of the potential student to work this idea out into a
project proposal, optionally by talking to the
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Remko Tronçon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When (if) you accept this project idea, let me know (by mailing me directly
or by replying to this thread).
AFAIK, we don't 'accept' project ideas, we just propose them. It's
left as a task of the potential student
Tobias Markmann wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Remko Tronçon[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When (if) you accept this project idea, let me know (by mailing me directly or
by replying to this thread).
AFAIK, we don't 'accept' project ideas, we just propose them. It's
left as
I'm looking into client side Java impls of Jingle, and I'm not finding
much out there besides the smack extension. I'm a bit nervous about
using it b/c it seems like it has essentially been abandoned (no commits
to the jingle extension in 10 months).
Anyone know of other good Jingle Java
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Peter Saint-Andre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So this would merely be a library and would not be integrated into an
existing client or server?
Right, but it would of general interest for the whole community for
1) understanding if EXI works for our case
2)
Tobias Markmann wrote:
I proposed this idea and this kind of gateway because it won't harm
IRC users and will enable jabber users to connect to a certain
network. The operators of some IRC network would just have to allow
this new transport to connect to their other servers via IRC S2S
Tim Julien wrote:
I'm looking into client side Java impls of Jingle, and I'm not finding
much out there besides the smack extension. I'm a bit nervous about
using it b/c it seems like it has essentially been abandoned (no commits
to the jingle extension in 10 months).
Anyone know of other
Dnia 2008-03-17, pon o godzinie 23:17 -0700, NehaP pisze:
It does however, respond with feature var='msgoffline'/
So, does that mean something useful? I guess the server does support
offline
message handling, just in some other manner?
This is a jabberd 1.x style offline message handling.
On Mar 18, 2008, at 10:57 AM, Fabio Forno wrote:
The only XMPP specific part I'd require is the creation of the initial
dictionaries for the most used namespaces, since EXI would be useless
without them.
Using XEP 211 and 213 as starting points?
--
Joe Hildebrand
Hi all,
I have been playing with the idea of using Jabber as a multiplexing
instant messaging client for a little while now, and would like to
know what others think. By multiplexing I mean that a user could be
logged in to the same account from several locations at once (a
separate client would
On 2008-03-19 01:23, Andrew Yates wrote:
I have been playing with the idea of using Jabber as a multiplexing
instant messaging client for a little while now, and would like to
know what others think. By multiplexing I mean that a user could be
logged in to the same account from several locations
I think you can accomplish this already using RDP, VNC, or screen.
I realize something like this is possible with VNC/NX/RDP/screen
(which I do use for irc, email, and other applications), but I don't
find those as convenient for Jabber. This may have something to do
with my usage patterns,
18 matches
Mail list logo
