Le mercredi 16 avril 2008, Sander Devrieze a écrit :
2008/4/16, Sander Devrieze [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2008/4/16, Remko Tronçon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Screenshot attached.
Wow, that's confusing. I was at least hoping that you would use
different icons for things where you hide the
2008/4/16, Olivier Goffart [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
snip
I don't see the link with JID escaping.
JID Escaping can be used to show [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the roster
instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED].
No it can't (you can't hide the @msn.example.org part with escaping)
Could be, but JID Escaping
Screenshot attached.
Wow, that's confusing. I was at least hoping that you would use
different icons for things where you hide the real JID from the user,
or visualize which transport this belongs to. Now there's no way to
distinguish between [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] in
your
Could be, but JID Escaping is at least required (that is what Mats
said to me). Screenshot attached.
Thats bad UI design IMO, if you are going to hide part of the address
because its on a transport you need to at least represent it
differently, i.e. with an MSN icon next to it rather than
2008/4/16, Remko Tronçon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Screenshot attached.
Wow, that's confusing. I was at least hoping that you would use
different icons for things where you hide the real JID from the user,
or visualize which transport this belongs to. Now there's no way to
distinguish between
2008/4/16, Sander Devrieze [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2008/4/16, Remko Tronçon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Screenshot attached.
Wow, that's confusing. I was at least hoping that you would use
different icons for things where you hide the real JID from the user,
or visualize which transport
2008/4/16, Richard Dobson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Could be, but JID Escaping is at least required (that is what Mats
said to me). Screenshot attached.
Thats bad UI design IMO, if you are going to hide part of the address
because its on a transport you need to at least represent it
Florian Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I just stumbled upon is message on the Websteam Mailinglist, and asked
myself the question, why don't we ? ... have a roster item exchange
XEP? I think this would be a big step for XMPP, if this could be
implemented. Not only for transports, but
Magnus Henoch wrote:
Florian Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I just stumbled upon is message on the Websteam Mailinglist, and asked
myself the question, why don't we ? ... have a roster item exchange
XEP? I think this would be a big step for XMPP, if this could be
implemented. Not
Le lundi 14 avril 2008, Sander Devrieze a écrit :
2008/4/14, Remko Tronçon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Isn't JID Escaping support and/or User Nickname support in both client
and transport a better solution for this?
I don't see the link with JID escaping.
JID Escaping can be used to show
I just stumbled upon is message on the Websteam Mailinglist, and asked
myself the question, why don't we ? ... have a roster item exchange XEP? I
http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0144.html
This has been implemented in PyMSN-t and Psi, although I forgot
whether it is actually in PyMSN-t
Dnia 2008-04-14, pon o godzinie 09:17 +0200, Remko Tronçon pisze:
you still have to accept one
'mass' subscription, but it's a lot less annoying than acking every
single contact.
That depends only on the UI design.
If an app shows separate question window for every subscription request,
then
That depends only on the UI design.
If an app shows separate question window for every subscription request,
then yes - this may be annoying.
Acking is just one aspect though; roster item exchange also handles
initialization of nicknames and groups.
cheers,
Remko
2008/4/14, Remko Tronçon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
That depends only on the UI design.
If an app shows separate question window for every subscription request,
then yes - this may be annoying.
Acking is just one aspect though; roster item exchange also handles
initialization of nicknames
Isn't JID Escaping support and/or User Nickname support in both client
and transport a better solution for this?
I don't see the link with JID escaping. As for user nickname support:
user nickname is for nickname updates, not nickname initialization.
You could leave the name of your roster
Sent: 14 April 2008 04:31 PM
To: Jabber/XMPP software development list
Subject: Re: [jdev] Roster Item Exchange XEP
Isn't JID Escaping support and/or User Nickname support in both client
and transport a better solution for this?
I don't see the link with JID escaping. As for user nickname
2008/4/14, Remko Tronçon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Isn't JID Escaping support and/or User Nickname support in both client
and transport a better solution for this?
I don't see the link with JID escaping.
JID Escaping can be used to show [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the roster
instead of [EMAIL
Hi,
I just stumbled upon is message on the Websteam Mailinglist, and asked
myself the question, why don't we ? ... have a roster item exchange XEP?
I think this would be a big step for XMPP, if this could be implemented.
Not only for transports, but also for Applications using Jabber. What
18 matches
Mail list logo
