Hi Matthias,
--On Samstag, 26. August 2006 02:35 +0200 Matthias Wimmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
So I'd say which way you are using to generate the resources depends on
your goals. E.g. you might not want to show IP addresses or PIDs to not
leak information about how you set-up your server.
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 02:20:22AM +0200, Sander Devrieze wrote:
Op vrijdag 25 augustus 2006 18:22, schreef Norman Rasmussen:
On 8/25/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You could parse the Message-Id of the email and use that as the xmpp
resource when authenticating your xmpp
On 26 Aug 2006, at 11:04, Brian Campbell wrote:
Perhaps I'm missing something obvious here, but why not use server
generated resources? According to the RFC, any XMPP compliant server
ought to make up a new resource identifier if you don't specify one
when
binding.
I'm guessing we were all
Hi,
On 2006/08/25, at 18:29, Hal Rottenberg wrote:
On 8/24/06, Christian Hammers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This account does not need to be visibly online or receive any
answers
I just want to (mis)use Jabber to replace the old Samba+Winpopup
solution.
(Of course I could implement it like a
Christian Hammers wrote:
Is it possible to send messages from different programs simultaneously
using only one account?
(...)
But as this program reacts on emails via /etc/aliases, it may happen that
more than one instance gets started simultaneously but only the first one
is allowed to
On 25 Aug 2006, at 11:08, Maciek Niedzielski wrote:
Christian Hammers wrote:
Is it possible to send messages from different programs
simultaneously
using only one account?
Make sure you use different resource identifiers for different
connections and you should be fine.
If you want a
You could parse the Message-Id of the email and use that as the xmpp resource when authenticating your xmpp client.PID of the spawned process that parses the email will work as well.. but someday you may want to run your program on more than one machine ;-)Christian Hammers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 8/25/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You could parse the Message-Id of the email and use that as the xmpp
resource when authenticating your xmpp client.
PID of the spawned process that parses the email will work as well.. but
someday you may want to run your program on more
On 8/24/06, Christian Hammers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This account does not need to be visibly online or receive any answers
I just want to (mis)use Jabber to replace the old Samba+Winpopup
solution.
(Of course I could implement it like a single threaded printer-spooler
but maybe there already
Op vrijdag 25 augustus 2006 18:22, schreef Norman Rasmussen:
On 8/25/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You could parse the Message-Id of the email and use that as the xmpp
resource when authenticating your xmpp client.
PID of the spawned process that parses the email will
10 matches
Mail list logo
