Re: Is it worth establishing a separate mailing list for the GitHub message traffic?

2021-02-04 Thread Tilmann
Maybe it is possible to reduce the volume a bit? For example currently many messages are sent twice, once from GitHub and again from GitBox. Maybe than can be avoided? Tilmann On 04/02/2021 23:21, JDO Spec wrote: Personally, I have no problem with the number of messages on the jdo-dev list

Re: Is it worth establishing a separate mailing list for the GitHub message traffic?

2021-02-04 Thread JDO Spec
Personally, I have no problem with the number of messages on the jdo-dev list that come from github/gitbox/contributors. If we push it off to another list it's just one more list I will need to subscribe to in order to pay attention. It's all important. In the near future when we are mostly

Re: Is it worth establishing a separate mailing list for the GitHub message traffic?

2021-02-04 Thread Bouschen, Michael
Hi Tilmann, yes, I'll put it one the agenda. Regards Michael yes it does, we merged 4 (or 5?) PRs today, but I agree it is a bit noisy. @Michael, should we put this on the agenda for next time? tilmann On 04/02/2021 21:29, Bryan Pendleton wrote: Seems like the new website machinery

Re: Is it worth establishing a separate mailing list for the GitHub message traffic?

2021-02-04 Thread Tilmann Zäschke
yes it does, we merged 4 (or 5?) PRs today, but I agree it is a bit noisy. @Michael, should we put this on the agenda for next time? tilmann On 04/02/2021 21:29, Bryan Pendleton wrote: Seems like the new website machinery generates a lot of messages? bryan -- Forwarded message

Is it worth establishing a separate mailing list for the GitHub message traffic?

2021-02-04 Thread Bryan Pendleton
Seems like the new website machinery generates a lot of messages? bryan -- Forwarded message - From: GitBox Date: Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 11:20 AM Subject: [GitHub] [db-jdo-site] tzaeschke merged pull request #19: Update pom.xml To: tzaeschke merged pull request #19: URL: