First choice is UPPER_CASE second choice is lower_case
-Brian
On Feb 14, 2005, at 6:42 PM, Matthew T. Adams wrote:
I like UPPER_CASE...
-Original Message-
From: Michelle Caisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 3:41 PM
To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
Subject: Convention
Hi Michelle,
My notes say that we decided ultimately to leave Person as concrete and
to map all the classes in that hierarchy to a Person table.
yes, this is what I recall, too.
- Person is concrete
- Employee is abstract
- FullTimeEmployee and PartTimeEmployee are both concrete
All of them are
Yes, that does need to be done. I can do that when I have my turn at
the spreadsheet.
-- Michelle
Michael Bouschen wrote:
Hi Craig, hi Michelle,
some chapters of the JDO spec are renumbered from 1.0 to 2.0:
ChapterJDO 1.0 JDO 2.0
Extent15 19
Hi Michelle,
I thought about this again and meanwhile I'm not sure whether we should
do the renumbering of the assertions. It is a lot of work changing the
spreadsheet and the corresponding TCK test classes. But what concerns me
more is that all the TCK test cases we have today are valid JDO 1
Javadogs,
So when I tried to subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
jdo-dev@db.apache.org, I realized I don't know how to do it. The
subscribe message takes the from email address. And I don't know how
to fake this.
Can anyone help?
Craig
On Feb 11, 2005, at 1:10 PM, Geoff hendrey wrote:
Put us all on
