[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-192?page=all ]
Michelle Caisse updated JDO-192:
Attachment: JDO-192.patch
I reviewed the patch on 10/4 and it looks good. Please go ahead and check it
in.
testRetrieve : has incorrect parameter
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-192?page=all ]
Michelle Caisse reassigned JDO-192:
---
Assign To: Erik Bengtson
testRetrieve : has incorrect parameter specification to PM.retrieve() in
terms of the fgOnly parameter.
Hi,
some news: the two issues Andy resolved yesterday (JDO-170 and JDO-174)
are back on the list. But now a couple of subcomponents disappeared. The
BROWSE PROJECT page only lists tck11, tck20 and No Component.
Any idea?
Regards Michael
Hi Andy,
yes, I figured out the same and just
I see the same thing. Very weird. -- Michelle
Michael Bouschen wrote:
Hi,
some news: the two issues Andy resolved yesterday (JDO-170 and
JDO-174) are back on the list. But now a couple of subcomponents
disappeared. The BROWSE PROJECT page only lists tck11, tck20 and No
Component.
Any
Hi Andy,
I recently ran into the same issue and sent out an email to the jdo
experts. I should have cc'ed the jdo-dev alias, sorry for that. Craig
replied that the TO keyword has been removed from Chapter 14 and its use
in the BNF (chapter 24) is an oversight. So the correct syntax is:
Hi Karan,
thanks for the pointer.
I just checked ibiblio http://www.ibiblio.org/maven/antlr/jars/ and
antlr-2.7.5.jar is back. The md5 file antlr-2.7.5.jar.md5 is missing,
but the build works w/o the md5 file.
Regards Michael
Michael,
Brett Porter is the guy I know of.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Michelle,
It seems that I dont have rights to commit even using the https
Quoting Michelle Caisse (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-192?page=all ]
Michelle Caisse reassigned JDO-192:
---
Assign To: Erik
Hi Craig,
Hi Michael,
The relevant bit of the specification is regarding jdoPostLoad. A10.1-2
[This method is not modified by the enhancer.]
So whatever is done in jdoPostLoad, the implementation will not be
called transparently.
But the spec doesn't require jdoPostLoad to be called if
Hy !
We had a look on the JDO TCK 2.0 Tests.
It looks like the JDO metadata for the non Map Collection Classes isn't
correct aswell.
For Example:
VectorCollections.jdo
has defined:
field name=VectorOfObject0
collection element-type=org.apache.jdo.tck.pc.fieldtypes.SimpleClass
/collection
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-98?page=all ]
Andy Jefferson reassigned JDO-98:
-
Assign To: Michelle Caisse (was: Andy Jefferson)
With JPOX latest build this now fails with
10 matches
Mail list logo