OK, now tell us why you would want to change the default conflict
resolution strategy, mainly the one that says that the most recent
rule will fire first. Actually, it's a bit more complex than that
and the reasoning for using MEA versus LEX versus other methods were
explored and answered
Thank you for your answer Alan,
Your Strategy implementation will have to examine both activations and
if the rule for each one is the same, apply a random ordering between
the two - I think...
Sorry if my question seems obvious, I am new with the Jess API. I looked the
Activation class
Thank you James,
If the Agenda conflict resolution is running correctly, and if
everything else in the rules are equal, then the recency part of the
conflict resolution will probably fire the last one asserted. If
that is a problem, then this might not be a good rulebase application
Hello everybody,
I am wondering if it is possible to randomize the firing order, when one
rule is activated by many facts. Indeed a rule is always fired according the
reversed order of assertion. So this example
(reset)
(assert (a 1))
(assert (a 2))
(assert (a 3))
(defrule example
(a
Nicolas Fortin wrote:
Hello everybody,
I am wondering if it is possible to randomize the firing order,
You can create an object that implements the jess.Strategy interface, see:
http://herzberg.ca.sandia.gov/jess/docs/70/api/jess/Strategy.html
You will implement the compare() method and
