A lot of inference engines also go by the moniker reasoner now,
especially when discussed in the context of the semantic web. These
reasoners' inferences are often, at least in part, processed by
techniques different than those used by the more typical rule-
production system methods
Lucia,
Though in this case it's not a significant problem, be cautious with
the use of conditionals on the right hand side. I've seen a few too
many well-intentioned newbies write rules that have more logic on the
RHS than on the LHS! If one ends up authoring nested conditionals on
the
(defrule rule
(Customer (address ?address))
(PO (customer ?customer))
(test (= 0 (str-compare ((?customer getAddress) getStreet) (?
address getStreet
=
(bind ?name (?customer getName))
(bind ?addr (?address getStreet))
(printout t ?addr : customer: ?name crlf)
On Jun 24, 2008, at 8:53 AM, Peter Lin wrote:
I'm going to disagree that NRL is an anti-pattern.
OK.
It all depends on how you use it.
Agreed... though since I having a tendency to be querolous, I'd
change how to when.
I've successfully designed and built custom business
rule
On Jun 23, 2008, at 6:40 PM, Barry Flower wrote:
I am interested in using Natural Rules Language for business rules
definition and was wondering if anyone is aware of an
implementation (commercial or otherwise) that can be used with
Jess. I understand that it would need to be constrained for a
Russ,
Double-check the extends optional phrase in your defclass calls
(and/or from-class declarations in deftemplate declarations).
- Mike Smith
On May 18, 2008, at 8:03 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have the following class structure
IInterface1
getName()
IInterface2 extends
On Apr 9, 2007, at 9:13 PM, Jim Yates wrote:
I'm trying to build a rule that matches shadow facts using a Java
Bean template. I want to build the following logic:
(facilitycode != 'K' and faciltiycode!= 'S' and (amt 7500 or amt
-7500 or rvu -500 or rvu 500) )
OR ( (quantity -10 or
On 3/7/07, Ernest Friedman-Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I put it to a vote on the list about 18 months ago whether Jess ought
to relax this restriction, and very surprisingly, most people who
responded wanted to keep things the way they are; perhaps they
misunderstood the question. I may have
-specific .
On Feb 8, 2007, at 11:39 PM, Michael Smith wrote:
Hey,
In Jess, is there any way to trigger a change to a single property
and have only those rules that reference the property be affected?
To unsubscribe, send
FWIW, I find an Emacs shell a wonderful, feature-rich way to interact
with a command line to Jess (or CLIPS). Once in the command line
this is essentially independent of the platform OS. But familiarity
with Emacs would be required for this to be a good solution.
- Mike
On Nov 15, 2006,
10 matches
Mail list logo
