One might very well argue that the automatic definition of a template
for ordered facts, as in
(defrule r (t 1 ?two) = ... )
or any fact definition is somewhat dangerous since it might cover up
anything from a simple typos to a major syntax error. Adding the option
of suppressing the
Hi,
I have tried loading the following code with the batch command, then
(run)ing the whole lot, unfortunately my rule is not firing. I was expecting
the rule to fire, and as a result there should be several new
locality-street-match facts.
The code includes:
I would help to pretty-print your rules. If you had, you could see that you
have (eq ?ov ?locality) (eq ?wv ?street) as patterns within an and to be
matched rather than (test (and (eq ?ov ?locality) (eq ?wv ?street))). By the
way, the outer and on the LHS of locality-stree is unnecessary.
-users@sandia.gov
Subject: JESS: No rules firing
Hi,
I have tried loading the following code with the batch command, then
(run)ing the whole lot, unfortunately my rule is not firing. I was expecting
the rule to fire, and as a result there should
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Government of Canada | Gouvernement du Canada
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew J
Hutchinson
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 2:48 PM
To: jess-users@sandia.gov
Subject: JESS: No rules firing
Hi,
I have tried loading
