JESS: Multislot with single value

Title: Multislot with single value Hello, I'm having a slight problem. I have this template: (deftemplate grouped-facts facts that have been grouped (slot partitionname) (slot partitionvalue) (slot summationvalue) (multislot factcollection)) Where factcollection is a collection of

JESS: few questions

Is there a way to call one rule from another., instead of recreating non-similar conditions in another rule too? Is it required for dynamic bean to have m_name as property and a constructor? Thanks Bhaskar To

RE: JESS: Multislot with single value

Title: Multislot with single value Multifields require the $?varname syntax on the LHS. You might try the following: (defrule bondMVMaxPCOutstanding::calcifnc (declare (auto-focus TRUE)) (rulesfired (rules bondMVMaxPCOutstanding)) ?b - (grouped-facts (partitionname cusip)

RE: JESS: few questions

I think that Bhaskar wrote: Is there a way to call one rule from another. Hi Bhaskar, First, make sure that you're not trying to procedurally control the rules from firing, otherwise you violate the Zen of Jess http://herzberg.ca.sandia.gov/jess/zen.shtml. You might want to try using the

RE: JESS: Multislot with single value

I think that Chirang wrote: I need to check any of the facts have a particular slot value in the factcollection. Hi Chirang, Two things: 1) You need to add a $ to the LHS pattern when matching a multifield. So, you have to write: (factcollection $?fc) Make sure that you drop the $ when using the

JESS: forall conditional element

Hi everybody, It is written in "The Jess Language" section that the forall conditionalrule : Jess (defrule forall-example (not (and (a ?x) (not (b ?x =) would be activated, if for every fact (a ?x), there is a fact (b ?x). However, after I added the forall rule and the following

RE: JESS: forall conditional element

Title: RE: JESS: forall conditional element Did you do a (reset) before (run)? alan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nicolas Fortin Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 12:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: JESS: forall conditional

Re: JESS: few questions

I think [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a way to call one rule from another., instead of recreating non-similar conditions in another rule too? If you're worried about duplication on the right-hand-side of rules, you can write a deffunction, and call it on the right-hand-side of both

JESS: (reset) and (initial-fact)

One of the more annoying bits of Jess's CLIPS legacy is that it starts up with an empty working memory, but for many kinds of rules to work properly, the (initial-fact) asserted by (reset) has to be there. We saw someone else bothered by this problem on the list today. I was just wondering: would

RE: JESS: (reset) and (initial-fact)

Title: RE: JESS: (reset) and (initial-fact) Could you introduce a new constructor with a switch controlling this behavior? The existing constructor could maintain the old behavior and anyone wanting the new behavior could use it explicitly. Alternatively, could you have a derived Rete (or

Re: JESS: forall conditional element

Title: RE: JESS: forall conditional element Hi Alan, Thanks for your prompt answer. That was the mistake. Sorry to annoy you with my newbie question. Thanks again, Nicolas - Original Message - From: Alan Moore To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004

RE: JESS: (reset) and (initial-fact)

Well, I guess we could ask under what conditions would it be undesirable for Rete objects to be created in a reset state. If we can't think of any negative side-effects, then no harm done and the benefits are as Ernest stated. As I understand it from