Re: JESS: On the Performance of Logical Retractions

2011-06-10 Thread Md Oliya
@Peter: I werent interested to plug into Rete at first place, neither had should I use RETE or how does RETE perform in mind. Rather, I was trying to find a solution for my problem at hand, and the more and more i developed my own solution, i found it to be more and more similar to the Rete. So I

Re: JESS: On the Performance of Logical Retractions

2011-06-10 Thread Peter Lin
I've looked at OpenRuleBench in the past and I just looked at it again real quick. The way the test was done is the wrong way to use a production rule engine. That's my bias opinion. I understand the intent was to measure the performance with the same data, and similar rules. The point I'm trying

Re: JESS: On the Performance of Logical Retractions

2011-06-10 Thread Ernest Friedman-Hill
Yeah, I just had a look too, and I think the report on their site says it all. Jess and Drools are at the bottom of their performance results for a reason -- because they're being misapplied. If your problem looks like the kinds of problems they're benchmarking, then by all means use one