Hi,
On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 12:48 AM Shawn Heisey via jetty-users
wrote:
> What exactly are you seeing in the RFC that says it's required? I
> believe you, but I am apparently blind, because I can't see it.
The HEADERS frame is defined to carry a "Field Block Fragment",
defined in section 4.3.
Looks like chatgpt is hallucinating again.
-joakim
On Tue, Sep 5, 2023, 5:47 PM Shawn Heisey via jetty-users <
jetty-users@eclipse.org> wrote:
> On 9/5/23 02:40, Simone Bordet wrote:
> > Do you have pointers?
> >
> > The RFC is quite clear that HPACK is mandatory for HTTP/2:
> >
>
On 9/5/23 02:40, Simone Bordet wrote:
Do you have pointers?
The RFC is quite clear that HPACK is mandatory for HTTP/2:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9113.html#name-field-section-compression-a
I asked chatgpt. This is the full response:
---
HTTP/2 does not strictly require HPACK support,
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 1:24 AM Shawn Heisey via jetty-users
wrote:
>
> On 9/4/23 13:49, Shawn Heisey via jetty-users wrote:
> > * Proceed without HPACK, logging a message at WARN about it. This
> > assumes that http2 CAN operate without hpack. If http2 requires hpack,
> > then I think it
On 9/4/23 13:49, Shawn Heisey via jetty-users wrote:
* Proceed without HPACK, logging a message at WARN about it. This
assumes that http2 CAN operate without hpack. If http2 requires hpack,
then I think it should not be in a separate jar from the main http2
implementation. I read through
