On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 08:20 -0600, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
> Here is a patch that should get you by this specific error,
I bet you'd rather have a patch that compiles. Apply this one instead.
--
David Kleikamp
IBM Linux Technology Center
Index: jfsutils/fsck/fsckmeta.c
On Tue, 2004-12-07 at 23:59 -0800, Sang Nguyen Van wrote:
> processing terminated: 12/8/2004 8:49:47 with return
> code: 10052 exit code: 8. [xchkdsk.c:472]
Here is a patch that should get you by this specific error, but I'm not
sure how much further you'll get. This is a failure to read an in
--- Dave Kleikamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm, this is what the patch was supposed to fix.
> Could you try running
> fsck with the -d flag (debug)?
The result is:
...:/ # jfs_fsck -d /dev/hdb1
jfs_fsck version 1.1.7, 22-Jul-2004
processing started: 12/8/2004 8.49.47
Using default paramete
On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 23:56 -0800, Sang Nguyen Van wrote:
> --- Dave Kleikamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Okay, I've seen this before and this patch to
> > jfsutils should get fsck
> > past phase 1. Could you please give it a try?
> >
> I've just built and installed the new jfsutils with
> the
--- Dave Kleikamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, I've seen this before and this patch to
> jfsutils should get fsck
> past phase 1. Could you please give it a try?
>
I've just built and installed the new jfsutils with
the patches in those 3 files which you pointed out.
The results of jfs_fsc
On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 07:26 -0800, Sang Nguyen Van wrote:
> ... # jfs_fsck /dev/hdb1
> jfs_fsck version 1.1.7, 22-Jul-2004
> processing started: 12/6/2004 16.17.41
> Using default parameter: -p
> The current device is: /dev/hdb1
> Block size in bytes: 4096
> Filesystem size in blocks: 40019915
