[Jfs-discussion] Re: Linux v2.5.42

On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Linus Torvalds wrote: >... > Summary of changes from v2.5.41 to v2.5.42 > >... > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > o Initial check in of cifs filesystem version 0.54 for Linux 2.5 (to > clean tree as one changeset) >... Both jfs and ci

[Jfs-discussion] 2.5.60: JFS no longer compiles with gcc 2.95

On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 11:08:28AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: >... > Summary of changes from v2.5.59 to v2.5.60 > >... > Dave Kleikamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >... > o JFS: replace ugly JFS debug macros with simpler ones >... This broke the compilation

[Jfs-discussion] Re: 2.5.60: JFS no longer compiles with gcc 2.95

On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 01:43:26PM -0800, James Lamanna wrote: > >>> This broke the compilation with gcc 2.95: > <-- snip --> > ... > gcc -Wp,-MD,fs/jfs/.super.o.d -D__KERNEL__ -Iinclude -Wall > -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common > -pipe -mpreferred-sta

[Jfs-discussion] Re: [PATCH - 2.5.60] JFS no longer compiles with gcc 2.95

On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 08:52:36AM -0600, Dave Kleikamp wrote: > I'm not sure what's causing the problem, but Andrew Morton send me this > patch which gets rid of the problem for him. The fmt string that > jfs_err() is invoked with is sufficient to identify the location, so > __FILE__ and __LIN

[Jfs-discussion] [2.6 patch] jfs_metapage.c: remove an unused function

[ this time without the problems due to a digital signature... ] The patch below removes an unused function from fs/jfs/jfs_metapage.c diffstat output: fs/jfs/jfs_metapage.c |5 - 1 files changed, 5 deletions(-) Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- linux-2.6.10-r

[Jfs-discussion] [2.6 patch] JFS: make some symbols static

: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- linux-2.6.10-rc1-mm2-full/fs/jfs/jfs_logmgr.c.old 2004-10-30 08:24:18.0 +0200 +++ linux-2.6.10-rc1-mm2-full/fs/jfs/jfs_logmgr.c 2004-10-30 08:58:06.0 +0200 @@ -161,9 +161,9 @@ /* * Global list of active external jo