Dave Kleikamp wrote:
On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 11:38 -0500, Sonny Rao wrote:
Yeah, that seems to fix it for this particular case. I wonder if
we're just delaying the inevitable though? Would it make sense to
pre-allocate tlocks somehow before holding important semaphores?
Admittedly, my understand
Sonny Rao wrote:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 04:59:19PM -0600, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 12:30 -0600, Steven Pratt wrote:
Also, is it maybe time to increase the default number of locks? We had
similar problems on large systems in SLES9 testing and we still have to
run
