Re: [jibx-users] Abstract Mapping

[Dennis Sosnoski]

The current handling in the code is actually more flexible than the 
description states. You might be able to use two levels of abstract 
mapping in the case you describe. All I can suggest is you try it to see 
if it works for your case.

I'm trying to clean this up and make it much more flexible for beta 4.
 - Dennis
Felix Lo wrote:
Hi,
I'm wondering what "one level" abstract mapping means.
Does it mean that I can only have one level of subclassing in my classes that 
can be mapped to the XML
so for example
class a
{
}
class b extends a
{
}
class c extends b
{
}
can i map c using something similiar to
<structure map-as=b>
and b mapping would have
<structure map-as=a>

I think this doesn't work :p

-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
jibx-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users