Re: [jibx-users] maping of detached enum being unwrapped

2007-05-15 Thread Dennis Sosnoski
Hi Andrey, It looks like there's a problem in the simpleType reference handling with the Axis2 JiBX unwrapped code generation. This is something I haven't tried before, but I'll look into it. In the meantime, it'd be good if you could report this as an issue in the Axis2 Jira at

Re: [jibx-users] maping of detached enum being unwrapped

2007-05-15 Thread Andrey A. Chujko
Hello Dennis, The new issue is here https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-2670. Though, I had solved the problem with wrapping all the input parameters into a wrapper/filter object, which could be utilized with all GetProducs family routines. Kind regards, Andrey. Dennis Sosnoski

Re: [jibx-users] Error in JiBX marshalling with Rampart

2007-05-15 Thread Glenard Loy
Here's what's in my binding.xml: binding xmlns:tns=http://ws.memberclicks.com/types/xsd; force-classes=true namespace uri=http://ws.memberclicks.com/types/xsd; default=elements/ mapping abstract=true class=com.mc.persistence.bean.event.EventBean type-name=tns:EventInfo

[jibx-users] [ANN] JiBX and Axis2 training classes - U.S. and Australia

2007-05-15 Thread Dennis Sosnoski
I'm now scheduling JiBX and/or Axis2 training classes for the U.S. for June, and for Australia in July. The current Axis2 in Action course outline is at http://www.sosnoski.com/companys/axis2class.html with a separate SOA for Developers course outline at

[jibx-users] name attribute not allowed on reference to mapping with extensions

2007-05-15 Thread Joanna Muench
I've encountered this error and I'm not sure how to work around it. The scenario is that I have two schemas I'm trying to map and recently created a new type, ModeledNumericQuantity, that extends an existing type NumericQuantity. The new mapping looks as such: mapping abstract=true

Re: [jibx-users] name attribute not allowed on reference to mapping with extensions

2007-05-15 Thread Dennis Sosnoski
Hi Joanna, The extends=... attribute is only needed for a mapping when you're implementing the equivalent of schema substitution groups. It's not intended for use where you're just doing the equivalent of schema type extension. The tutorial at