= containerObject.getClass().getDeclaredMethod(set +
camelCasedFieldName, List.class);
setterMethod.invoke(containerObject, resultCollection);
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
return ???;
}
Thanks in advance.
--
Ju@N
Hi everyone. First of all, excuse my english...
I have an xml structure lile this
Something
header
...
...
/header
body
...
...
/body
/Something
I have a Message class with a Header and Body structures inside.
I have to unmarshall always the header tag,
Hi, I am still getting problems to write in english :-( , so I´ll
try to explain wath my doubt is as short as possible.
I have an incoming XML with this (resume) structure:
client
docNum/
docIdentifier/
PersonName/
client/
And my classes are:
class Doc{
public string number;
Thanks for the help, I have already solve (in some way) the problem in
the same way that yo do. The thing is that I REALLY need my mappings
to be ordered=false and flexible=true, but seems like abstract is
not supporting that, if you do:
mapping classchild class
Hi again, I resolved (in some way) my problem of extending classes
using a combination of abstract an extends; but now I can not make the
abstract mapping being ordered=false and flexible=true (and, trust
me, I need it).
When doing that only the fields of the base mapping are being
unmarshalled,
