Hi Kai,
Thanks for the hint; unfortunately it does not work because we have
already a ns defined on the mapping level and we can't use prefixes.
What we probably need, would be that we could put namespace in the
context of a structure, instead of an element. Currently, if we try that
option,
This *is* a real limitation of the current binding definition structure.
The problem is that I didn't foresee needing to add namespace
definitions at the structure level. Right now the only way to handle
what you want through the binding definition is by using mapping
instead of structure.
I'm doing some similar things in the JibxSoap WSDL generation. I'm
trying right now to get JiBX beta 3c ready, and when that's done I'll
also release JibxSoap.
- Dennis
Stefano Fornari wrote:
Hi All,
We would like to follow the suggestion of writing a marshaller to work
around our namespace