On 09/29/2010 12:05 PM, kammous@orange-ftgroup.com wrote:
Dear JMeter users,
I am a new JMeter user and I would like to ask you kindly to helping me in
resolving this issue :
In the distributed JMeter testing tutorial :
Thank you for this response.
This functionality may be useful when system under test is composed of many
servers or follows a distributed architecture like peep to peep systems (the
target is client and server at the same time). Furthermore, it allows to
simulate user behaviors (a behavior =
On 29 September 2010 11:05, kammous@orange-ftgroup.com wrote:
Dear JMeter users,
I am a new JMeter user and I would like to ask you kindly to helping me in
resolving this issue :
In the distributed JMeter testing tutorial :
Solution that consists in launching many JMeter GUI have some drawbacks:
I did not imply using the GUI. I find the GUI helpful mostly for
creating Test Plans. As a rule, I will run real stress tests in non-GUI
mode. This is can even be scaled out, but the server is usually better
suited, no
How do you arrive at that figure?
The network traffic from server to client depends on the test plan
listeners and the server configuration.
And the percentage overhead surely depends on the current network traffic?
-
The voice input and output is very good in this
I think the best way to solve your problem is to introduce the variables
after recording the test. Alternatively, you can set the value of the
pre-defined variables to something like this abcdjaksdljk12232. This will
make sure that the recording text is not replaced with the variable
Is it possible to send HTTP GET request with a separate entity body?
I want to send a JSON payload with HTTP GET request but don't want to put it
in the URL (or rather the lead designer doesn't).
I also support HTTP POST which is essentially the same as GET in my case.
That is, there shall be no
Hey
Namaskara~Nalama~Guten Tag
The network traffic from client to server depends on the request-response.
Whereas the network traffic between master and slaves is only for sending
what type of request to send to server and the result statistics (which
would be very very less)
Deepak
--
Keigu
On 29 September 2010 18:40, Deepak Goel deic...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey
Namaskara~Nalama~Guten Tag
The network traffic from client to server depends on the request-response.
Whereas the network traffic between master and slaves is only for sending
what type of request to send to server and the
Hey
Namaskara~Nalama~Guten Tag
Well, the network traffic between client and server would be for 15 slaves
= Server. For most applications this network traffic would be
significantly higher than the Master =15 Slave network traffic.
If you find a system which the case is otherwise, please let me
Ill just add one thing , your volumes (10,000) users would probably need you
to load your results in a DB , so you could actually run everything
independently(as separate JMeter instances instead of master slave just kick
all the plans off at the same time using a cron on each PC or something) and
On 29 September 2010 19:04, Deepak Goel deic...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey
Namaskara~Nalama~Guten Tag
Well, the network traffic between client and server would be for 15 slaves
= Server. For most applications this network traffic would be
significantly higher than the Master =15 Slave network
Using JMeter 2.4 r961953. In my test plan I have an If
Controller(LastSampleOk) as a parent of Controllers and HTTP Samplers
with Evaluate for all children set. The condition for LastSmapleOk
is ${JMeterThread.last_sample_ok}. I executed two passes, the first
pass works flawlessly and doesn't
upload the files somewhere and post a link.
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Derry, Stanton stan_de...@intuit.comwrote:
Using JMeter 2.4 r961953. In my test plan I have an “If
Controller”(LastSampleOk) as a parent of Controllers and HTTP Samplers with
“Evaluate for all children” set. The
Just a suggestion, it still won't be easy:
- test machines with synchronized clocks (look at about time in case of
winodws, similar tools in case of other OS);
- synchronizing of the threads occurs at certain intervals;
- use beanshell to control this...
itl won't be pretty, though. Maybe
Sorry for the attachment The View Results Tree Listener screen
snapshot is at
https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0ByNiYXcp87RqMGIzYzI4M2MtMjdlMS00ZWY2LWE
1OTUtNTZiZTEwMDAyMWMyhl=enauthkey=CKbCzP4J
Stan
-Original Message-
From: Deepak Shetty [mailto:shet...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday,
Hi
I dont see a problem with Last Sampler Ok, its terminating correctly right ,
no sampler after the error is executed?
The second pass should execute the same set of samplers failing at the
same spot, however, it doesn’t.
Not necessarily. Your test might be passing something incorrectly at the
The two passes, from InTheBeginning to AtTheEnd, should have produced
the same set of samplers and errors. In the first pass the flow fails
at TTO-0090-ttoentry/SSO and all samplers after that in the scope of
LastSampleOk are not executed. In the second pass, a failure occurs
at
Hey
Namaskara~Nalama~Guten Tag
I forgot to add, i am unsure about the server configuration, but if there
are multiple web servers-app servers-db servers-file servers and there are
lot of sub transactions within a transaction, there would be significantly
more traffic on the network which would
I worked around the issue by adding If Controller
${JMeterThread.last_sample_ok} to each sampler. Using the Evaluate
for all Children seemed to be a nice way of handling the check if the
prior sampler had failed.
Would be nice if the Thread group had an option Continue to next
iteration on
How many threads do you have running and from the screenshot I cant make out
whether they are simple controllers / if controllers or something completely
different? Again whether or not the test fails at the same point depends on
your test.
Ill try this for simplified test case and see if it
Thread Group properties, 1 thread, loop 2. There is a combination of If,
Simple, and Throughput controllers in the scope of LastSampleOk which is
an If controller with the condition ${JMeterThread.last_sample_ok} and
Evaluate for all children selected. If I can post the test plan I
will.
Stan
Can I send the link directly to you?
-Original Message-
From: Deepak Shetty [mailto:shet...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 3:47 PM
To: JMeter Users List
Subject: Re: Problem with If Controller - Evaluate for all Children
How many threads do you have running and from the
hi
yes . I wont be able to try it out till later today though .
regards
deepak
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Derry, Stanton stan_de...@intuit.comwrote:
Can I send the link directly to you?
-Original Message-
From: Deepak Shetty [mailto:shet...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday,
On 29 September 2010 23:41, Deepak Goel deic...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey
Namaskara~Nalama~Guten Tag
I forgot to add, i am unsure about the server configuration, but if there
are multiple web servers-app servers-db servers-file servers and there are
lot of sub transactions within a transaction,
Hey
Namaskara~Nalama~Guten Tag
I think they are trying load testing and it is not the actual production
system. I doubt if your hypothesis is true. Anyways it is best for the
person who posted the question (and any other person who is in a similar
situation) to post their observations.
Deepak
26 matches
Mail list logo
