Thanks all, for your help.
For what it's worth (in the event that other people get stuck on this same
issue), I converted everything using punycode and it's worked just fine.
--
View this message in context:
Rajiv,
Will one assertion work for all the requests?
Thanks Regards,
Palani Selvam
-Original Message-
From: Rajiv Nanduani [mailto:rajivkumarnandv...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 11:28 AM
To: JMeter Users List
Subject: Re: Verify the response contents
hi refer this
no u can add multiple response assertion
On , Selvam T, Palani palani.selv...@altisource.com wrote:
Rajiv,
Will one assertion work for all the requests?
Thanks Regards,
Palani Selvam
-Original Message-
From: Rajiv Nanduani [mailto:rajivkumarnandv...@gmail.com]
None of them, you can't get this metric in JMeter, only request response
time.
Std. deviation is a mathematical calculation, it has no normal value. But if
you're not setting any kind of defined pacing or regulating throughput
according to requirements then you'd possibly see something like this.
As a matter of fact you CAN add assertions that have multiple requests in
their scope.
--
View this message in context:
http://jmeter.512774.n5.nabble.com/Verify-the-response-contents-tp4509356p4509939.html
Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
If I had to make the server highly available, which values should I
increase or decrease?
Is it the Average and Max that I should decrease. or only monitoring
the throughput will do it.
--
Shiplu Mokadd.im
My talks, http://talk.cmyweb.net
Follow me, http://twitter.com/shiplu
Innovation
Much, much, more context required.
--
View this message in context:
http://jmeter.512774.n5.nabble.com/Measure-execution-time-of-a-website-tp4508895p4510899.html
Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
Thanks Oliver.. that did the trick. Appreciate the help. I am using JMeter
2.4 and thought that headers in csv file will work fine but it seems thats
not the case.
--
View this message in context:
Hello all,
Does jmeter-server need to be configured to make use of a multicore CPU?
Thx!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-user-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-user-h...@jakarta.apache.org
On 21 June 2011 20:22, Kevin Biggs biggs...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
Does jmeter-server need to be configured to make use of a multicore CPU?
Does Java?
Thx!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Well, they do work fine, in a sense, you just have to avoid header rows. As
with any software you need to prove things work as you want them to and not
trust what it says on the tin!
But JM is, I think, the leader of the pack in the open source test tool
arena and although I often spend a bit of
200 != OK - think of this as a golden rule; It will make your life more
fulfilling.
--
View this message in context:
http://jmeter.512774.n5.nabble.com/jMeter-http-post-requests-are-not-working-tp4424846p4512284.html
Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Yes, that does seem to have worked. I spin off the sub-threads then wait
using thread.join() until all the sub-threads are done. Then I call
result.sampleEnd() on the outer sample. Thank you, that was very helpful.
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Bruce Ide flyingrhenqu...@gmail.comwrote:
I
trying to run with 200 threads. what the best way to determine ramp up
period. i started with 200 as ramp-up period but that causes some of the
thread operation to fail - not a jmeter error but an error when script
performs an opeartion against the web server.
if i change thread to be =100 things
What happened when you experimented with other ramp up periods?
--
View this message in context:
http://jmeter.512774.n5.nabble.com/determining-ramp-up-period-tp4512401p4512425.html
Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I would get 500 response from the web code for random threads. some
threads would finish while others would fail on certain pages
From: Oliver Lloyd [via JMeter]
[mailto:ml-node+4512425-1961098570-45...@n5.nabble.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 8:07 PM
To: Jeegnesh Sheth
Subject: Re:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:38 AM, jsheth jsh...@src-solutions.com wrote:
I would get 500 response from the web code for random threads. some
threads would finish while others would fail on certain pages
Chances are this is showing you peak load issues with your web server
- which you didn't
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:31 AM, jsheth jsh...@src-solutions.com wrote:
So for 200 threads I should set my ramp up time to be 6000?
Ramp up time = 6000 seconds.
This will start a new thread, on average, every 6000/200 = 30 seconds
where all threads will be running after 6000/60 = 100 minutes
Also see
http://jakarta.apache.org/jmeter/usermanual/test_plan.html#thread_group
and
http://www.google.com/search?q=jmeter+calculate+ramp+up+time
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-user-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org
For
I would rather not have it that slow
I just ran it with 200 threads and 6000seconds ramp up time and I got
ERROR - jmeter.engine.StandardJMeterEngine: Uncaught exception:
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded
200 threads and 200 ramp up period results in 500 server error
Hi,
I have a question about the Constant Throughput Timer. I have the
following configuration:
Thread Group (10 threads)
--- Transaction Controller
--- HTTP Request
--- View Results In Table
--- Constant Throughput Timer (60 samples per minute)
Now I noticed that the waiting time for the
21 matches
Mail list logo
