[Jmol-developers] [ jmol-Bugs-3016142 ] g03 MO visualization wrong?

2010-06-16 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #3016142, was opened at 2010-06-14 15:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hansonr You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=379133aid=3016142group_id=23629 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment

[Jmol-developers] [ jmol-Bugs-3016142 ] g03 MO visualization wrong?

2010-06-16 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #3016142, was opened at 2010-06-14 15:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hansonr You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=379133aid=3016142group_id=23629 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment

[Jmol-developers] [ jmol-Bugs-3016142 ] g03 MO visualization wrong?

2010-06-16 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #3016142, was opened at 2010-06-14 15:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hansonr You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=379133aid=3016142group_id=23629 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment

[Jmol-developers] [ jmol-Bugs-3016142 ] g03 MO visualization wrong?

2010-06-16 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #3016142, was opened at 2010-06-14 15:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hansonr You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=379133aid=3016142group_id=23629 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment

[Jmol-developers] [ jmol-Bugs-3016142 ] g03 MO visualization wrong?

2010-06-16 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #3016142, was opened at 2010-06-14 15:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hansonr You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=379133aid=3016142group_id=23629 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment

[Jmol-developers] [ jmol-Bugs-3017294 ] g03 MO visualization wrong follow-up

2010-06-16 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #3017294, was opened at 2010-06-16 15:44 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by rkanters You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=379133aid=3017294group_id=23629 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the

[Jmol-developers] [ jmol-Bugs-3017294 ] g03 MO visualization wrong follow-up

2010-06-16 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #3017294, was opened at 2010-06-16 15:44 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rkanters You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=379133aid=3017294group_id=23629 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment

[Jmol-developers] Something funny about WebExport's save...

2010-06-16 Thread Jonathan Gutow
Bob and Angel, Presently if you try to save a WebExport page with the same name as one you've already made (ie update it), you end up opening the existing directory and saving a new one inside of it. I thought we had set this up to just replace the files within the existing directory. Bob,

[Jmol-developers] My tests suggest the widgets are now working pretty well in WebExport...

2010-06-16 Thread Jonathan Gutow
Angel, I think everything you've done is working in web export. Thanks. I haven't found any problems. I still have to fire up a Windows VM and play with IE, but not problems in Mozilla and WebKit browsers. I'm going to see if I can get my cranky windows VM to boot. I'll let you know if I

Re: [Jmol-developers] Something funny about WebExport's save...

2010-06-16 Thread Angel Herráez
Presently if you try to save a WebExport page with the same name as one you've already made (ie update it), you end up opening the existing directory and saving a new one inside of it. Right. That's quite inconvenient to me, and I think it may be unpleasant for users. If not, I

Re: [Jmol-developers] My tests suggest the widgets are now working pretty well in WebExport...

2010-06-16 Thread Angel Herráez
On 16 Jun 2010 at 16:49, Jonathan Gutow wrote: Oh, did the translation issue in the help go away? If not, I'll look at the code again. Last time I looked, the menu links in the header section were translated (I think), but the content of the help page still was not. But I must do a clean

Re: [Jmol-developers] My tests suggest the widgets are now working pretty well in WebExport...

2010-06-16 Thread Angel Herráez
Ok, so I've just tested RC19 The WebPageMaker Help pages display all in Spanish, until when I click on the link for widgets, that page comes in English. And all further navigation with links takes me to the English pages. Thanks for looking into this, Jonathan

[Jmol-developers] WebExport local path is not matched in the generated pages

2010-06-16 Thread Angel Herráez
Jonathan, the local path issue is still not working 12.0.RC19 I have .. set in both server and local paths in the ExportToWeb panel. The page I get (both PopIn or ScriptButton) has both local variables set as .: var jmollocaljarpath = .; // where JmolApplet*.jar is to be found locally var

Re: [Jmol-developers] WebExport local path is not matched in the generated pages

2010-06-16 Thread Jonathan Gutow
OK, I'll check that too. Thought I'd finally fixed that. Jonathan On Jun 16, 2010, at 5:41 PM, Angel Herráez wrote: Jonathan, the local path issue is still not working 12.0.RC19 I have .. set in both server and local paths in the ExportToWeb panel. The page I get (both PopIn or

Re: [Jmol-developers] My tests suggest the widgets are now working pretty well in WebExport...

2010-06-16 Thread Jonathan Gutow
Found it and committed a fix. You had missed a few links when translating and were still linking to the English pages. Jonathan On Jun 16, 2010, at 5:30 PM, Angel Herráez wrote: Ok, so I've just tested RC19 The WebPageMaker Help pages display all in Spanish, until when I click on the

Re: [Jmol-developers] WebExport local path is not matched in the generated pages

2010-06-16 Thread Jonathan Gutow
Fixed in my last commit. Sorry, I did a copy and paste from a test page and deleted the flags to replace these values with the user values. It seems to all be working now. Please give it one last test. Thanks, Jonathan On Jun 16, 2010, at 5:41 PM, Angel Herráez wrote: Jonathan, the local