Re: [Jmol-developers] WebExport static?

2010-11-13 Thread Angel Herráez
Sorry, I don't understand what static fields mean. Whatever I contributed to WebExport was based on duplicating or editing exissting code. I don't really grasp the inners of Java code. -- Centralized Desktop Delivery:

Re: [Jmol-developers] WebExport static?

2010-11-13 Thread Jonathan Gutow
I cannot recall a reason for them being static. I do recall we had some issues that required us to make sure that some things were protected. I may have time to look at the code this afternoon. Any module in particular? Jonathan On Nov 12, 2010, at 7:36 PM, Robert Hanson wrote: Jonathan,

Re: [Jmol-developers] WebExport static?

2010-11-13 Thread Robert Hanson
WebExport is the one. I've carefully gone through all the other Jmol code and made sure that there are no static references to anything but constants. This is important from a threading point of view. I think it's OK as it is, but it just seems messy to me. A quick look suggested it's a very

Re: [Jmol-developers] WebExport static?

2010-11-13 Thread Jonathan Gutow
Bob, I think these are a holdover from when we were trying to maintain the ability of webexport to run separately. It is now so dependent on direct connections to the rest of Jmol that I do not think it can run without Jmol. Thus I will put on my list (maybe for January) the removal of all