Re: [Jmol-developers] Ideas for Jmol extension for MediaWiki

2010-11-29 Thread Nicolas Vervelle
Hi again, Currently, the extension needs to use the signed applet when working with the SMILES string or the PDB code. That's normal because it requires services hosted by other sites, but it's not very user friendly. I'd like to be able to use the unsigned applet even for SMILES string or PDB

Re: [Jmol-developers] Ideas for Jmol extension for MediaWiki

2010-11-29 Thread Angel Herráez
The proxy feature is great news, Bob (I know it's not new, but I never grasped its utility). Nico wrote: What are the exact URL used for SMILES and PDB ? Documented at http://wiki.jmol.org/index.php/File_formats/Chemical_Structure Nico wrote: Is it possible to configure Jmol for

Re: [Jmol-developers] Ideas for Jmol extension for MediaWiki

2010-11-24 Thread Nicolas Vervelle
Hi Jonathan, On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Jonathan Gutow gu...@uwosh.edu wrote: Nico, Bob can give you the details, but I think both things you suggest are possible. However, I see one big problem: in general I do not think we should default to opening a live Jmol in the wiki. A

Re: [Jmol-developers] Ideas for Jmol extension for MediaWiki

2010-11-24 Thread Robert Hanson
Very important to use the UNSIGNED applet, I think, by the way. Just too much the signed applet could do in a Wiki environment. -- Robert M. Hanson Professor of Chemistry St. Olaf College 1520 St. Olaf Ave. Northfield, MN 55057 http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr phone: 507-786-3107 If nature

[Jmol-developers] Ideas for Jmol extension for MediaWiki

2010-11-23 Thread Nicolas Vervelle
Hi, I have started working again on the extension to include Jmol in Wikipedia. The current extension is not as simple as some Wikipedia people would like (see this bugzilla reporthttps://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16491 ). One idea there is that a Media handler for molecular files

Re: [Jmol-developers] Ideas for Jmol extension for MediaWiki

2010-11-23 Thread Jonathan Gutow
Nico, Bob can give you the details, but I think both things you suggest are possible. However, I see one big problem: in general I do not think we should default to opening a live Jmol in the wiki. A static picture which can then become a live Jmol is more appropriate. I think you