Re: [Jmol-developers] wording change

2010-07-20 Thread Robert Hanson
Thanks, Angel. Honestly, I think the experienced users are exactly the ones who should and will want to use Jmol.js! 2010/7/19 Angel Herráez angel.herr...@uah.es After this dicussion, I have made some changes in what goes in the website, advising about the fate of the applet tag and the

Re: [Jmol-developers] wording change

2010-07-19 Thread Angel Herráez
After this dicussion, I have made some changes in what goes in the website, advising about the fate of the applet tag and the strong convenenice of only using Jmol.js The update is already online. (Thanks, Nico) http://jmol.sourceforge.net/docs/ http://jmol.sourceforge.net/scripting/ I wasn't

Re: [Jmol-developers] wording change

2010-07-14 Thread william reusch
Bob, If the applet tag is depreciated in HTML5, what will be the fate of old web pages written in HTML4 that use this tag? Bill Robert Hanson wrote: http://jmol.sourceforge.net/docs/#Scripting%20for%20Jmol I suggest we change this text: Scripting JmolApplet Without

Re: [Jmol-developers] wording change

2010-07-14 Thread Angel Herráez
Bob is probably more knowledgeable than me, but this is how I see things: If you have the HTML4 doctype in the header, the browsers will interpret as such. No problem with applet. After all, this tag is already deprecated in 4.01, but the browsers respect it.

Re: [Jmol-developers] wording change

2010-07-14 Thread Robert Hanson
just what you think.. history! On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 1:54 PM, william reusch whreu...@msu.edu wrote: Bob, If the applet tag is depreciated in HTML5, what will be the fate of old web pages written in HTML4 that use this tag? Bill Robert Hanson wrote:

Re: [Jmol-developers] wording change

2010-07-14 Thread Jonathan Gutow
I find this very amusing as before the applet tag there was just the object tag...So now we're reverting! Jonathan On Jul 14, 2010, at 2:48 PM, Angel Herráez wrote: Bob is probably more knowledgeable than me, but this is how I see things: If you have the HTML4 doctype in the header, the

[Jmol-developers] wording change

2010-07-12 Thread Robert Hanson
http://jmol.sourceforge.net/docs/#Scripting%20for%20Jmol I suggest we change this text: Scripting JmolApplet Without Using the JavaScript Library *Please, note that these methods http://jmol.sourceforge.net/scripting/ are not recommended. You should use them only if you are experienced and you

Re: [Jmol-developers] wording change

2010-07-12 Thread Angel Herráez
I can do that change in the website. But we should think whether the linked pages (old method of writing the applet) should be removed altogether or left as now, with the caveat added (they were old doc pages and until now I was reluctant to remove and loose them for good)