The round() business was a great idea.
Molecule name -- I see -- as part of the header comments, right?
viewer.getModelSetName()
that can come back null.
Bob
2009/7/17 Angel Herráez angel.herr...@uah.es
Bob, can you supervise my last commit? Thanks
I read about compacting VRML files, one
On 18 Jul 2009 at 9:12, Robert Hanson wrote:
Molecule name -- I see -- as part of the header comments, right?
Right
viewer.getModelSetName()
that can come back null.
Oh yes, I found out yesterday after several blind trials. At first I was trying
Viewer.getModelSetName() --following the
Bob wrote (on jmol-users):
also put on your list getting the perspective right. Does the VRML use a 4x4
matrix to
define the orientation, by chance?
I assume you mean the user's point of view fo the model.
There is a viewpoint orientation in vrml that takes 4 values. I imagine that
could be
I'm starting to enjoy looking at these VRML pages. I got the rotation in, so
the view should (almost) match -- camera is still not quite right, and I
don't know if we really care about that or not. I think I have all the DRAW
objects working, DOTS are working, BACKBONE is in, and DOUBLE BONDS are
