Hi Bob,
Thanks for the replies! Sorry I haven't gotten back to you yet; I was
out of town.
By the way, the talk of these mysterious simulations of mine appears
to be getting ever more murky, albeit in slight increments. If you're
curious, I'm processing data from simulations as described in Ab
Matt, you are SO in luck.
1) You can define the array data, but it seems to me more appropriate just
to define a starting point for each. Right? Something like this should do
the job:
# Jmol math here
function runAnimation()
frame *
display none
var timeStep = 10 #whatever
var startTimes =
Matt, I did check this out more carefully, and I see now that there was a
bug in Jmol for appended trajectories. It's fixed, but it's in Jmol 11.7.3,
which has not been released yet. If you are interested in getting a look at
this, take a look at
Matt, good to hear this! Comments below. - Bob
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 10:09 PM, Matthew Zwier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
A few days ago, Bob Hanson mentioned that improved support for display
of MD trajectories is on the docket for 11.7. I'm interested in
surveying the lay of the
Hi Bob,
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 10:10 AM, Robert Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt, good to hear this! Comments below. - Bob
1) Are there plans to support simultaneous display of multiple
trajectories?
The big issue is memory. Jmol can handle about 120,000 atoms (at least on my
machine)
Hey, Matt, you might be in luck.
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Matthew Zwier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At least, I think you can Supposed to be able to. You are just
limited
to one trajectory step from EACH sequence loaded. I can't imagine why
that
would take any major amount of
Hi all,
A few days ago, Bob Hanson mentioned that improved support for display
of MD trajectories is on the docket for 11.7. I'm interested in
surveying the lay of the land and possibly helping out with the coding
for MD trajectory support. I have a couple questions/thoughts, mostly
related to
