[Jmol-users] Fwd: jmol-11.6 bug

2008-10-05 Thread Robert Hanson
Victor, Thanks for the picture. That's just an illusion. The 11.6.RC16 image has set perspectiveDepth OFF and the two balls are exactly the same size. The 11.4.6 image has set perspectiveDepth ON and something like set cameraFactor 0.1 showing a bizarrely distorted molecule. The

Re: [Jmol-users] jmol movie

2008-10-05 Thread Jennifer L. Muzyka
I had no trouble watching the Jmol movie on my computer, running Windows XP. -Jennifer Message: 2 Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 12:25:34 -0500 From: Robert Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Jmol-users] jmol movie To: jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Jmol-users] jmol movie

2008-10-05 Thread Rich
No problem seeing it here Bob (OSX 10.4.11, Camino 1.6.4 with QT 7.5.5 with the Xvid codec). I did re-export it as an image sequence (145 images) and created a new movie at 2 fps (using QT) to make it more easily watched. There are some rather odd H atoms wandering around/displayed which I'm

Re: [Jmol-users] jmol movie

2008-10-05 Thread Robert Hanson
OK, then I think we have the capability now of creating Jmol video movies. The addition to Jmol, to be in 11.7, not 11.6, is; write frames {xxx} movie.jpg {xxx} is some atom expression, such as {*} (all frames) or {1.0} (all models in the first file) or {1.1,1.3,1.5} (three specific frames).

Re: [Jmol-users] moving draw objects produces duplicates

2008-10-05 Thread Robert Hanson
OK, I'll not worry about it. You can force Jmol to create only one object using the FIXED keyword within the DRAW command. That makes the object appear in every frame. Unless you do that, if four files are displayed, you might get four separate points. Bob On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 6:21 PM, Angel

Re: [Jmol-users] Jmol 11.6 release -- delayed

2008-10-05 Thread Robert Hanson
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Rolf Huehne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rolf Huehne wrote: 3) The java.security.AccessControlException problem still remains. I don't know if this is specific to our site because I can't check it with other sites. But it must be caused by changes introduced

[Jmol-users] jmol movie

2008-10-05 Thread Nick Greeves
Fine on MacOS X 10.5.5/Safari/QT resolution clear but rather fast to actually see anything! While it was downloading, it played a bit then stopped and was pixelated. Fine once it was all downloaded though. All the best Nick -- 3D Organic Animations http://www.chemtube3d.com Tel:

[Jmol-users] en_GB translation ?

2008-10-05 Thread Robert Hanson
Recently an en_GB (United Kingdom) translation for Jmol was introduced. I'm fixing that a bit, but at the same time I'm wondering if people realize that this adds 200K to the size of the applet for all UK users. (That's a 30% increase in base size.) Questions: 1. Not that it isn't good to have

Re: [Jmol-users] ff3 vs safari.. again.. load

2008-10-05 Thread Robert Hanson
Angel has it exactly. Just to be clear, for ANY browser: 1) Never use jmolScript() during page loading. The applet won't be there. 2) Never run a Jmol script from the body onload event. On most browsers the applet won't be loaded yet. 3) If possible, put whatever start-up script you want to use

Re: [Jmol-users] Translucent cylinder disappears when viewed edge on

2008-10-05 Thread Robert Hanson
this is fixed for Jmol 11.6 On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 12:20 AM, Dean Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Here's an odd one. My (very short) translucent cylinders disappear when viewed within a few degrees of edge-on. To be more exact, the center disappears while the edge remains visible. These

Re: [Jmol-users] Translucent cylinder disappears when viewed edge on

2008-10-05 Thread Dean Johnston
Just confirming that the fix works for me. Thanks Bob. Dean On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 8:20 PM, Robert Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: this is fixed for Jmol 11.6 On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 12:20 AM, Dean Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Here's an odd one. My (very short) translucent cylinders