[Jmol-users] jmolGetPropertyAsJavaObject(image)

2008-09-24 Thread Steven R. Spilatro
Bob, I've played around with jmolGetPropertyAsJavaObject(image). Is it possible that this function is actually returning a base64 encoded string instead of JPEG code? I find that these two statements yield identical results: var x = jmolGetPropertyAsJavaObject(image) or var x =

Re: [Jmol-users] final testing appreciated

2008-09-24 Thread rob yang
Final testing appreciated for Jmol 11.6. Anything you can do to try to break it would be great. Has anyone had problems with Jmol applet when using firefox 3? I sometimes (strangely not always) get the following error: Your web browser is not fully compatible with Jmol browser: mozilla

Re: [Jmol-users] final testing appreciated

2008-09-24 Thread Thomas Stout
for what it's worth: I have never seen that using FF 3 on WinXP or linux ... I don't have a modern Mac, so have not been running Jmol there... -Tom On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 10:03 AM, rob yang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -- Final testing appreciated for Jmol

Re: [Jmol-users] final testing appreciated

2008-09-24 Thread Robert Hanson
I'll check into that. On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Thomas Stout [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: One oddity that I've just noticed: I downloaded 11.6.RC16 (several times in the last 24 hours) and find that if I run the stand alone or load the signed applet, they report version 11.6.RC16.

Re: [Jmol-users] final testing appreciated

2008-09-24 Thread Robert Hanson
Tom, could be your browser didn't get fully closed. You have to make sure all browser windows are closed and then restart the browser to use a newer version of the applet. Just putting it in a directory and navigating to a page won't do it. The release files are fine. Bob On Wed, Sep 24, 2008

Re: [Jmol-users] final testing appreciated

2008-09-24 Thread Robert Hanson
Rob, This message is from some version of browsercheck, I think. When you go here: http://jmol.sourceforge.net/browsercheck/ do you get that same message? I suspect the problem is that somebody's HTML needs updating. Does Jmol work fine for you in general, anyway? Bob On Wed, Sep 24,

Re: [Jmol-users] final testing appreciated

2008-09-24 Thread rob yang
Bob, Yes, Jmol has been working great for me before I upgraded to firefox3. I know it's a browser problem because it still works great on safari and IE7. After doing the browser check, I now know why and it has nothing to do with Jmol. It is because firefox3 on mac's don't support LiveConnect

Re: [Jmol-users] final testing appreciated

2008-09-24 Thread Angel Herráez
Rob, you must take with caution that diagnostics. Browsercheck is rather old* and its report is based on the browser identity (userAgent), not by testing the features. Do you mean that Firefox 2 was working correctly and Firefox 3 fails, on the same MacOS? If so, it's probably not that reason

Re: [Jmol-users] final testing appreciated

2008-09-24 Thread rob yang
Angel, The same html was working in firefox2 indeed. Firefox3 was giving me errors roughly 80% of time (works occasionally without any intentional tweaking to the browser). I just installed the java plugins as recommended by browsercheck, and now I am indeed admiring my jmol webpage in

Re: [Jmol-users] final testing appreciated

2008-09-24 Thread Robert Hanson
so do we conclude that the firefox3/Mac issue is resolved? What was the download you had to do to get that working? Bob On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 3:38 PM, rob yang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Angel, The same html was working in firefox2 indeed. Firefox3 was giving me errors roughly 80% of time

Re: [Jmol-users] final testing appreciated

2008-09-24 Thread rob yang
I installed this: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=107955package_id=116499release_id=591572 Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:40:50 -0500 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Jmol-users] final testing appreciated so do we conclude that the

Re: [Jmol-users] final testing appreciated

2008-09-24 Thread Robert Hanson
OH, OK, I'm glad that worked. I had heard about that and was wondering about it. Is that what then allows one to drag the applet out of the window and onto the desktop? Bob On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 3:45 PM, rob yang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I installed this:

Re: [Jmol-users] frame [array of models]?

2008-09-24 Thread Robert Hanson
frame * display 1.1,3.1,5.1 On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 3:41 PM, rob yang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi list, Is there a way to overlay any models of your choice? frame range only allows continuous frames. frame 1 3 overlays models 1 and 3 which is good. But what if I want to overlay models 1,

Re: [Jmol-users] final testing appreciated

2008-09-24 Thread Thomas Stout
Oh, I restarted everything - including the computer and re-downloaded all of the gzipped, the zip-ped and the full-source included versions! Not a big deal to me since I've switched over to the signed applet in order to provide local file loading and image saving... -Tom On Wed, Sep 24, 2008

Re: [Jmol-users] frame [array of models]?

2008-09-24 Thread rob yang
Hmm, that does the trick. What if I want to animate only selected models too? frame play animate the entire range of models including ones that are not displayed which results in blackout period. Any suggestions? Thank you. -Rob Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 16:07:34 -0500 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Jmol-users] final testing appreciated

2008-09-24 Thread rob yang
Not sure about the dragging to desktop part. I tried out of curiosity without success. But the java plugin made the applet working again in ff3, so yeah! -Rob Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 16:06:54 -0500 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Jmol-users] final

Re: [Jmol-users] Issues with FireFox on MacOS...that's odd...

2008-09-24 Thread Jonathan Gutow
Rob, I use both Safari and FF3 under MacOS. I didn't have any problem with the java embedding plugin disappearing between FF2 and FF3. It even updated to the latest version. I wonder how your install was different. I just did a drag and drop to my applications folder.