http://learningwebgl.com/blog/?p=6368 announce that OS X Yosemite will
support WebGL.
Could someone remind me whether this will be supremely immaterial to JSmol, or
make a big difference, or something in between?
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Dear Henry,
WebGL does make a big difference. You may test how Jmol renders on WebGL by
adding use=webgl to a Proteopedia URL, as in the following examples
http://proteopedia.org/w/1d66?use=webgl
http://proteopedia.org/w/HIV-1_protease?use=webgl
As I understand, not all the potential of Jmol
On 3 Jun 2014, at 15:51, Jaime Prilusky jaime.prilu...@weizmann.ac.il wrote:
Dear Henry,
WebGL does make a big difference. You may test how Jmol renders on WebGL by
adding use=webgl to a Proteopedia URL, as in the following examples
http://proteopedia.org/w/1d66?use=webgl
The bigger news is a few lines down:
*MUCH more importantly however: people are discovering that WebGL is
running in the beta of mobile Safari on iOS 8! The site HTML5 Test
http://html5test.com/compare/browser/ios-7.0/ios-8.0.html indicates this.*
That's certainly of interest, and a smart move.
Henry,
There is Jmol-JSO, which is the method to insert Jmol objects of any variant
into the web page (replacing the old Jmol.js method).
That may insert
a) a Java applet
b) an HTML5 object (JSmol)
c) a WebGL object
So WebGL is an alternative, it is not attached to either Jmol/Java or JSmol.
5 matches
Mail list logo