Re: [Jmol-users] coloring surface residues

2017-01-13 Thread Daniel Caffrey
That works. Thank you! On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 8:20 AM, Robert Hanson wrote: > OK, Dan, I found and fixed that one. The problem was that the command > > *color isosurface range 1 122* > > because it did not specify color scheme user: > > *color isosurface "user" range 1 122*

Re: [Jmol-users] coloring surface residues

2017-01-13 Thread Robert Hanson
OK, Dan, I found and fixed that one. The problem was that the command *color isosurface range 1 122* because it did not specify color scheme user: *color isosurface "user" range 1 122* reverted to the default color scheme, which is RGB. I consider that a bug -- the scheme already specified

Re: [Jmol-users] coloring surface residues

2017-01-12 Thread Daniel Caffrey
Sorry there was a pasting issue (ass should have been { ) . I've pasted a better test case below where residues GLY3 and ARG9 should be colored pink. Replacing color with colorscheme takes care of the error - Thank you. Assuming I understand the expected behavior of the command, jmol is not

Re: [Jmol-users] coloring surface residues

2017-01-12 Thread Robert Hanson
OK, I found it. An easy fix. will be in 14.8.1 to allowisosurface color "user" On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 6:42 PM, Robert Hanson wrote: > The simple fix is to replace "color" with "colorscheme". I'm looking into > why that is the case. > > > ​ > -- Robert M.

Re: [Jmol-users] coloring surface residues

2017-01-12 Thread Robert Hanson
Q: Is the "ass" here just something that happened in the transmission by email? ass255.0,255.0,0.0} ​ -- Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer