On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 13:15:48 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote:
> Test uses jdk.test.lib.Utils.getFreePort() when launching a new Java command.
> Looks like it already recognises "java.rmi.server.ExportException: Port
> already in use: " and retries, but there is a long-standing typo in the check.
>
>
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 22:46:47 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote:
>> Test uses jdk.test.lib.Utils.getFreePort() when launching a new Java
>> command.
>> Looks like it already recognises "java.rmi.server.ExportException: Port
>> already in use: " and retries, but there is a long-standing typo in the
>>
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 22:46:47 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote:
>> Test uses jdk.test.lib.Utils.getFreePort() when launching a new Java
>> command.
>> Looks like it already recognises "java.rmi.server.ExportException: Port
>> already in use: " and retries, but there is a long-standing typo in the
>>
On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 16:23:27 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote:
> Client.java has a fixed 30-second timeout on the CountDownLatch to wait for
> 10 notifications.
>
> If it fails, you can't tell if CountDownLatch.await threw, or returned false
> and the app threw InterruptedException, due to the way
On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 16:23:27 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote:
> Client.java has a fixed 30-second timeout on the CountDownLatch to wait for
> 10 notifications.
>
> If it fails, you can't tell if CountDownLatch.await threw, or returned false
> and the app threw InterruptedException, due to the way
On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 16:23:27 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote:
> Client.java has a fixed 30-second timeout on the CountDownLatch to wait for
> 10 notifications.
>
> If it fails, you can't tell if CountDownLatch.await threw, or returned false
> and the app threw InterruptedException, due to the way
