Hi,
On 11/24/2010 09:31 AM, Viesturs Zariņš wrote:
Paris, Syndney seems more accurate but Moscow, Tallin has similar offset.
Is there a way to improve the rectification?
The JOSM slippy map plugin does not have a control for moving the layer
like the WMS plugin has. I guess one could be
On 11/23/2010 01:35 PM, Tobias Wendorff wrote:
Now it's up to us to make the WMS-/Yahoo-plugin read Bing-tiles :-)
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb259689.aspx
Eh, I'll be happy if I can mapproxy that.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
2010/11/24 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
Hi,
On 11/24/2010 09:31 AM, Viesturs Zariņš wrote:
Paris, Syndney seems more accurate but Moscow, Tallin has similar offset.
Is there a way to improve the rectification?
The JOSM slippy map plugin does not have a control for moving the layer
On 24 nov. 2010, at 11:44, Frederik Ramm wrote:
The JOSM slippy map plugin does not have a control for moving the layer like
the WMS plugin has. I guess one could be added.
Other plugins (like PicLayer, ImportImagePlugin) also need this feature.
I think this is part of the features that
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com writes:
2010/11/24 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
Hi,
On 11/24/2010 09:31 AM, Viesturs Zariņš wrote:
Paris, Syndney seems more accurate but Moscow, Tallin has similar offset.
Is there a way to improve the rectification?
The JOSM slippy map
On 24 November 2010 16:07, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
in case of a constant offset at given locations (and not some warping
problem), it would be cool to store (and possibly collect in an OSM /
JOSM-database) those locations with their offsets for corrections, so
that a
2010/11/24 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
in case of a constant offset at given locations (and not some warping
problem), it would be cool to store (and possibly collect in an OSM /
JOSM-database) those locations with their offsets for corrections, so
that a user wouldn't have to adjust
Dear readers of OSM tagging and josm-dev lists,
after some discussion on german and italian mailing lists it has been
proposed to change the display values of sac_scale in JOSM's path template
to T1 ... T6 (see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sac_scale for
description,
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 9:36 PM, Stefan wrote:
You want to increase quality by removing information? Are you sure? At best
you will achieve a decrease in the sac_scale usage.
If any, add more information to josm, not less. If the description is
misleading, then change the description. Add
+1 from me.
I would say we need to set up such a system as fast as possible and
integrate with JOSM and Portlatch.
Otherwise we will end up with lots of data traced with incorrect offsets.
I would opt for submitting bug reports with points and offsets, so that
there is some review before the
10 matches
Mail list logo
