On Mon, 18 Mar 2013, Vincent Privat wrote:
Is this big and ugly new sponsor logo really needed as it ? I find very
disturbing to display such a large commercial logo without any discussion
first ?
Large one? I placed a rather small logo on the start page. The idea was to
show the sponsor,
Hi!
2013/3/18 Dirk Stöcker openstreet...@dstoecker.de:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013, Vincent Privat wrote:
Is this big and ugly new sponsor logo really needed as it ? I find very
disturbing to display such a large commercial logo without any discussion
first ?
Large one? I placed a rather small logo
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013, Martin Vonwald wrote:
Large one? I placed a rather small logo on the start page. The idea was to
show the sponsor, but very decent.
Ah - now I found the logo! Took me some time to spot it.
If they sponsor the server why should this be hidden? Everyone who's
willing to
On 3/18/13 8:23 AM, Martin Vonwald wrote:
Hi!
2013/3/18 Dirk Stöcker openstreet...@dstoecker.de:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013, Vincent Privat wrote:
Is this big and ugly new sponsor logo really needed as it ? I find very
disturbing to display such a large commercial logo without any discussion
first
Hi all,
you may be wondering why there is a new sponsor logo on the front page
of the JOSM website and why there has been some downtime lately. Let me
give you some updates.
In the last few days, we moved to a new server which is kindly sponsored
by the web hoster Hetzner [1]. The offer
On 03/18/2013 12:38 AM, Vincent Privat wrote:
Is this big and ugly new sponsor logo really needed as it ? I find very
disturbing to display such a large commercial logo without any discussion
first ?
I've slightly adapted the size and position:
from
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Dirk Stöcker
openstreet...@dstoecker.dewrote:
Hello,
additional to Pauls text some background information:
We had server troubles regarding the database performance for about 2
years now. Mainly these issues have been caused by the increasing activity
of
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013, Ian Dees wrote:
Why does JOSM rely on a database-driven wiki at all? It's great that you
use trac and the wiki for project management, but the stuff that JOSM loads
is all relatively static, right? The imagery, presets, styles, and front
page documents all change
Hi all,
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 17:14 +0100, Dirk Stöcker wrote:
So lots of thanks again to
First of all big thanks to the JOSM server admins (Dirk and Paul, I
guess) for administrating, optimising, keeping alive the server. There's
hardly a bigger obstacle than a not working project management
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Dirk Stöcker
openstreet...@dstoecker.dewrote:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013, Simon Legner wrote:
What about re-generating this file on modification and shipping as fast
as possible (using Apache directly, Nginx or Varsnish). Maybe, having a
subdomain for static
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013, Ian Dees wrote:
Would you consider requesting the imagery.xml from a separate server? I've
slowly been working on a project to store the imagery presets across all
editors [0] so that someone who wanted to add their imagery layer could do
it in one spot and have it show up
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Dirk Stöcker openstreet...@dstoecker.dewrote:
For the default maps sources externals will not be allowed. That would
disable the security checks.
What security checks are you talking about?
___
josm-dev mailing list
On 18.03.2013 18:31, Simon Legner wrote:
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 17:46 +0100, Dirk Stöcker wrote:
Thanks for your work.
Actually the amount of connects by JOSM itself can be ignored
compared to the web spiders, SPAM bots, hacker attempts and all the
other things accessing a webpage nowadays.
Ok thanks, it's much better right now, integrated on the right side of the
front page :)
I recognize I may have have over-reacted, sorry for that. Thank you Dirk
for finding us a new server :)
2013/3/18 Paul Hartmann phaau...@googlemail.com
On 03/18/2013 12:38 AM, Vincent Privat wrote:
Is
14 matches
Mail list logo