Re: [josm-dev] SunCertPathBuilderException

Hi Dirk, There are 3 or 4 "me too's" now on that talk-us thread. Some people are providing the info you asked for. The "me too's" start here: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2015-December/015785.html and the "next message" link should take you through the rest of the

[josm-dev] compiling plugins

Hi, I made changes to two plugins.Afterwards I read in the josm developer guide that I also need to commit the compiled jar file. I never compiled Java before and I don't have the time to figure this out in the next days. Can someone do this step for me this time, please?

Re: [josm-dev] SunCertPathBuilderException

On 15.12.2015 08:20, Dirk Stöcker wrote: Seems Java with Windows 7 does not work, Java with Windows 7 in browser works. Then we have to wait until Windows 7 dies to use it and renew Globalsign. the last report pointed to a quite recent configuration: Identification: JOSM/1.5 (9060 en) Windows

Re: [josm-dev] SunCertPathBuilderException

On Tue, 15 Dec 2015, Blake Girardot wrote: There are 3 or 4 "me too's" now on that talk-us thread. Some people are providing the info you asked for. The "me too's" start here: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2015-December/015785.html and the "next message" link should take

[josm-dev] JOSM Server certificate

Hello, today I switched our server certificate from Globalsign to Wosign. Works fine on my Linux systems also with Java. Could others please test and report if there are Java versions rejecting the certificate. If we have trouble we need to apply for a new Globalsign certificate, which is

[josm-dev] Renaming a validator rule

How feasible it is to rename a validator rule in https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Rules ? Last month we had an issue here in Brazil, where an user enabled the rules from Portugal and started to wrongly validate and modify data. Most probably the word "Português" caused this, since it can be

Re: [josm-dev] SunCertPathBuilderException

On Mon, 14 Dec 2015, Blake Girardot wrote: I am just forwarding this as I saw the note about changing the server certificate and thought this might be relevant. I realize it is not a very helpful report, but if it is relevant, we could follow up with him to get more information. Yes. Is

Re: [josm-dev] Renaming a validator rule

2015-12-14 20:16 GMT+01:00 Dirk Stöcker : > On Mon, 14 Dec 2015, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: >> Is there a way to force users migrating from one rule to another one? > > > I think if the old URL vanishs completely some weeks later they will get an > error, but I'm not

Re: [josm-dev] Renaming a validator rule

On Mon, 14 Dec 2015, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: How feasible it is to rename a validator rule in https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Rules ? Not a good idea. Technically, can rules be renamed? Yes. People who use the current rules will stay with an outdated rule forever if it gets

Re: [josm-dev] Renaming a validator rule

On Mon, 14 Dec 2015, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: Technically, can rules be renamed? In my last mail I talk about the whole rule and wiki page. It's no issue to simply change the "title" of the rule if that helps. Ciao -- http://www.dstoecker.eu/ (PGP key available)

Re: [josm-dev] SunCertPathBuilderException

On 14/12/2015 21:27, Dirk Stöcker wrote: On Mon, 14 Dec 2015, Blake Girardot wrote: I am just forwarding this as I saw the note about changing the server certificate and thought this might be relevant. I realize it is not a very helpful report, but if it is relevant, we could follow up with

[josm-dev] Fwd: [Talk-us] SunCertPathBuilderException

I am just forwarding this as I saw the note about changing the server certificate and thought this might be relevant. I realize it is not a very helpful report, but if it is relevant, we could follow up with him to get more information. Forwarded Message Subject:

Re: [josm-dev] SunCertPathBuilderException

On 12/14/2015 10:27 PM, Dirk Stöcker wrote: On Mon, 14 Dec 2015, Blake Girardot wrote: I am just forwarding this as I saw the note about changing the server certificate and thought this might be relevant. I realize it is not a very helpful report, but if it is relevant, we could follow up