[josm-dev] JOSM Tested

2010-03-03 Thread Dirk Stöcker
Hello, even if I'm still not 100% happy with current JOSM I would think we should make 3070 tested, wait for reports and maybe make comming saturday version tested again and afterwards start with new development. Comments, objections? Ciao -- http://www.dstoecker.eu/ (PGP key available)

Re: [josm-dev] JOSM Tested

2010-03-03 Thread Matthias Julius
Dirk Stöcker openstreet...@dstoecker.de writes: Hello, even if I'm still not 100% happy with current JOSM I would think we should make 3070 tested, wait for reports and maybe make comming saturday version tested again and afterwards start with new development. Comments, objections? I

Re: [josm-dev] self-intersecting ways

2010-03-03 Thread Richard Welty
On 3/3/10 4:29 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: Alan Mintz wrote: A similar problem exists with some landuse=* ways that people have glued to roads. I'd call that a bit of an error: Clearly that landuse doesn't continue all the way out to the street centerline. but for people using

Re: [josm-dev] self-intersecting ways

2010-03-03 Thread Teemu Koskinen
On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:31:32 +0200, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote: On 3/3/10 4:29 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: Alan Mintz wrote: A similar problem exists with some landuse=* ways that people have glued to roads. I'd call that a bit of an error: Clearly that landuse doesn't

Re: [josm-dev] self-intersecting ways

2010-03-03 Thread Richard Welty
On 3/3/10 5:43 PM, Teemu Koskinen wrote: On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:31:32 +0200, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote: but for people using josm w/the validator who are not aware of the issue, they are told that the duplicate nodes are an error, and there's a convenient fix button