Re: [josm-dev] JOSM and Java 6

2010-08-04 Thread Sebastian Klein
Dirk Stöcker wrote: Hello, according to a Trac ticket JOSM now finally used Java 6 functions. Could the one who did these changes please document the specific revision in the Startup page. The autosave feature [3378] by Jiri introduced Java 6 functions. So

Re: [josm-dev] Change to changeset comment handling, RfD

2010-08-04 Thread Frederik Ramm
Anthony, The way I like to think of this is: If you speak to another mapper later that day, and they ask you what you've been up to? and you answer them in one sentence - that's what you should put as a changeset comment. Sounds like a better place for that would be a diary entry. If

Re: [josm-dev] Change to changeset comment handling, RfD

2010-08-04 Thread Anthony
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 1:01 AM, Marko Mäkelä marko.mak...@iki.fi wrote: On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 08:08:56PM -0400, Anthony wrote: The quality of my own changeset comments is absolutely irrelevant in this discussion; let's assume, if it gives you pleasure, that they are all just That might

Re: [josm-dev] Change to changeset comment handling, RfD

2010-08-04 Thread Anthony
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 4:26 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote: Arguably, the changeset comment could be split up in a number of individual tags. Currently, people use it for different things - they say something about the source, about their method, about where they worked, about why

Re: [josm-dev] Change to changeset comment handling, RfD

2010-08-04 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, Anthony wrote: So do I... I just think it's unrealistic to expect it every time. It is also unrealistic to expect good OSM data edits every time. Still it's good if people try, and good if the software helps them with it. IMO the job of the software should be to make sure the person

Re: [josm-dev] Change to changeset comment handling, RfD

2010-08-04 Thread Anthony
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote: It is also unrealistic to expect good OSM data edits every time. Still it's good if people try, and good if the software helps them with it. Agreed. IMO the job of the software should be to make sure the person knows

Re: [josm-dev] Change to changeset comment handling, RfD

2010-08-04 Thread Dirk Stöcker
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010, Anthony wrote: And it is something that should be consistent across different editors. Actually this is nothing we need to worry about. JOSM is still settings the standards here. We have 50% of the market. Potlatch the remaining 50%. The other editors don't really count

Re: [josm-dev] Change to changeset comment handling, RfD

2010-08-04 Thread Sebastian Klein
Dirk Stöcker wrote: On Wed, 4 Aug 2010, Anthony wrote: And it is something that should be consistent across different editors. Actually this is nothing we need to worry about. JOSM is still settings the standards here. We have 50% of the market. Potlatch the remaining 50%. The other

Re: [josm-dev] Change to changeset comment handling, RfD

2010-08-04 Thread Dirk Stöcker
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010, Sebastian Klein wrote: Actually this is nothing we need to worry about. JOSM is still settings the standards here. We have 50% of the market. Potlatch the remaining 50%. The other editors don't really count at all ATM. Don't forget Merkaartor! It has a fair amount of