Is anyone else trying to use jQuery on the iPhone? I'm doing a game
using PhoneGap for iPhone and iPod Touch (with the hope of moving on
to other phones). Everything was going swimmingly until I tried a
mousedown event. Works correctly in PC and Mac versions of Safari, but
no event occurs until
I am a mostly-jQuery, sometimes Dojo user. I just came off a Dojo
contract and one thing I ended up using a lot was Dojo's ability to do
a query starting at a given node (subtree) of the DOM.
Now I'm on a jQuery project and I find that I don't know how to do
that in jQuery. Suppose I have done a
Nevermind. Sat down with jQuery in Action and found two
solutions. .find() and adding a parameter to $(). Funny I never did
that before in jQuery.
On Nov 9, 9:22 am, timothytoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am a mostly-jQuery, sometimes Dojo user. I just came off a Dojo
contract and one thing I
There was an earlier discussion:
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/4480f62e57bd7e82?tvc=2q=detect+whether+images
On Sep 7, 12:58 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi all,
i need to know, how can i indicate with javascript if the client
browser are
I went the other way, from computations on the server to computations
on the client. Here's why: if you have a large number of players, your
server costs will become a real problem. But the number of clients
available to do calculations expands with the number of players, and
client CPU time
That linked page does say, jQuery generally works with Konqueror and
Firefox 1.0.x,...
But in my experience, it's always a disaster. Maybe it did mostly work
with an older jQuery. I think it should be changed to say that jQuery
DOES NOT generally work in Konqueror.
On Sep 4, 5:23 am, MorningZ
Is there really a lot of code that relies on it? If there is, wouldn't
Chrome break on many more pages? I don't recall seeing any code that
assumes an order.
--tt
On Sep 4, 1:32 pm, Jörn Zaefferer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yes, but every other implementation does that, so a lot of code
Yeah, this doesn't make sense. Either the HTML is served (exists) or
it's created on the fly in some way later on by JavaScript.
On Sep 5, 8:01 am, S P Arif Sahari Wibowo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 5 Sep 2008, lukas wrote:
My PHP code creates a button which doesn't exist when my page
I don't think many read language specs, but I've heard over and over
(in books and online) that you can't rely on the order that you get
when you use in to set through keys. I thought that was fairly well
known. Nothing in the syntax hints that you'd get them in a certain
order.
However,
(arguments.callee);}})
();void(firebug);
On Sep 2, 4:52 pm, Michael Geary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From timothytoe
I'm not 100% sure, but I think you misread Matt's post. Matt
seemed to be saying the same thing you are--the order of keys
should not be relied upon.
If you take out Matt's post
That was me. I was up all night trying every site I could think of.
On Sep 3, 1:38 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder how come google load pages half the time that firefox 3.0 does ...
thats so interesting..right now I use firefox for its firebug and plugins
and I use safari 3 because it
That sounds suspiciously like what Safari does in some cases:
http://dreaminginjavascript.wordpress.com/2008/07/06/a-challenge/
On Sep 2, 2:49 pm, Matt Kruse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 2, 2:45 pm, Guyon Morée [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even though, Chrome seems to be a little bit faster
I have a very large app that works perfectly in Chrome (with lots of
jQuery and jQuery plugs), so the omens are good. One computationally
intensive bit takes 14 seconds in FF3 and 7 in Chrome. Amazing.
On Sep 2, 12:45 pm, Guyon Morée [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
With all the buzz around the
I'm not 100% sure, but I think you misread Matt's post. Matt seemed to
be saying the same thing you are--the order of keys should not be
relied upon.
On Sep 2, 4:26 pm, Michael Geary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Kruse wrote:
This appears to be a bad assumption in the jQuery tests.
I'm still waiting to find something reasonable.
On Jul 5, 3:49 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you find the History Plugin which You need I have the same Problem
with Bookmarking
On May 30, 6:11 pm, timothytoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great. I'll keep my eyes peeled.
On May 30, 7:55
Also, the jQuery file only has to be transfered once to each person
that used it. Then the browser just uses the cached file.
Well, that depends on a lot of things. :-)
I recently read a blog post (I think one of the Ajaxian guys) that
said maybe the first Monday of the month, we could point out that
modern browsers work better. I think an alert would be overkill,
unless the site really is unbearable in IE6. But maybe its is about
time for a little star or
Where my brother works, IE6 is mandated by IT. The employees are not
allowed to update.
I know. Irritating.
On Jun 8, 11:55 am, tudorizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Made this quick alert box for
IE6:http://tudorizer.wordpress.com/2008/06/08/anti-ie6/
For those preistoric guys who want to make
Is there a clever way to do JSON encoding and decoding in jQuery
without AJAX and without a form? Does all the serialization in jQuery
imply transmission via AJAX?
All I want is object - string and string - object.
Great. I'll keep my eyes peeled.
On May 30, 7:55 am, Klaus Hartl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 30, 1:35 am, timothytoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes. Oh well.
Where should I watch for updates? Will there be an update of history
to accommodate UI Tabs? Or is it more likely that UI Tabs
/Tabs#Does_UI_Tabs_support_back_button_and_b...
--Klaus
On May 28, 6:11 pm, timothytoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ajax History doesn't seem to be working for me.
I'm including the file (which I've thrown into my jQuery directory...
script type=text/javascript src=jQuery
Ajax History doesn't seem to be working for me.
I'm including the file (which I've thrown into my jQuery directory...
script type=text/javascript src=jQuery/
jquery.history_remote.js/script
And I've initialized the history (right after document.ready)...
I've been trying a few different versions of this plug-in. It's nice,
but the very first thing I have to do is override the colors.
blockquotecodelink rel=stylesheet type=text/css
href=jQuery/jquery.autocomplete.css /
!-- Override weird colors in css file --
style
Also, I'm adding entries as list elements to a UL. Is there a clever
way to keep someone from adding the same thing twice?
On Apr 2, 9:28 am, timothytoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been trying a few different versions of this plug-in. It's nice,
but the very first thing I have to do
Tricky.
If I were you, what I'd try next would be using jQuery's css() to
change to rtl in a setTimeout() call. Sounds stupid, but it might help
you narrow down the problem. I've had odd problems with browsers not
rendering anything until they come up for air, and doing things inside
a
details about what you're trying to do
when you end up with so many callbacks? It sounds like things could be
make cleaner using objects and callback methods instead of having tons
of nesting code blocks.
On Mar 7, 6:41 pm, timothytoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had a case where I had
I had a case where I had to wait for n records to come from the
server. They all had the same callback, which incremented a
counter.and checked to see if this load was the last one. It worked,
but I have thought about giving the whole lists of requests to the
server at once and having the server
Hehe. I _really_ hope the JScript gets faster in upcoming releases. It
seems as if their DOM stuff got faster but I haven't checked.
On Mar 6, 12:47 am, Michael Stuhr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
timothytoe schrieb: One thing I noticed is that the JavaScript is still
painfully slow,
but perhaps
, s.password);
the debugger says, Breaking on JScript runtime error - Permission
denied
--adam
On Mar 6, 9:40 am, timothytoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hehe. I _really_ hope the JScript gets faster in upcoming releases. It
seems as if their DOM stuff got faster but I haven't checked.
On Mar 6, 12
Scratch that. During the long calculation I show a chart to keep
people from being bored. It's negligible in FF, but turns out to be a
huge cost in IE (using excanvas). So I'm going to only show it in IE
1/4 as often. Still have to give people something to look at.
On Mar 6, 6:40 am, timothytoe
I was pretty excited to download IE8 today. All the jQuery stuff in my
app seems to work fine.
The debugger is pretty nice. I've always had trouble finding bugs in
IE.
Anyone find any IE8 jQuery problems yet?
It seemed to overwrite IE7, but it has an IE7 mode. I only did it on
one computer.
On Mar 5, 1:41 pm, Rey Bango [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did IE8 overwrite IE7 or can it work standalone?
Rey
timothytoe wrote:
I was pretty excited to download IE8 today. All the jQuery stuff in my
app
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/winfamily/ie/ie8/readiness/Install.htm
On Mar 5, 2:52 pm, Benjamin Sterling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim, can you point me to the download link?
On 3/5/08, timothytoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seemed to overwrite IE7, but it has an IE7 mode
One thing I noticed is that the JavaScript is still painfully slow,
but perhaps there is a lot of debug stuff in there slowing it down.
What takes 7 seconds in Safari and 8 in Firefox 3b3 takes 25 seconds
in IE8! (28 seconds in IE6).
On Mar 5, 2:54 pm, timothytoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http
I don't think there have been 4 or 5 topics. If there have been, I've
missed most of them. I remember one topic where someone was asking
about what books to read. And I started a kudos for the jQuery In
Action book. If there have been any others, I missed them and I'd like
to read them.
By the
You may find this article interesting...
http://osteele.com/archives/2006/04/javascript-memoization
On Mar 2, 11:50 pm, howa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Consider I have a simple plugin, e.g.
jQuery.example = function(name) {
sayHello = function(str) {
on the differences between
those 2 pieces of code...
On Feb 23, 2:05 am, timothytoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know if there's any practical difference. Maybe someone more
knowledgeable can chime it. Perhaps the former ends up being a savings
in file size if you have a lot of functions
That makes sense.
But it doesn't negate the fact that 'Google' Groups had funky response
yesterday. I hit it several times when 'Google' Groups apologized
because the boards were down, and once it came up in what looked like
a low-bandwidth version of the 'Google' Groups page.
No messages for
Thanks, Dave. You just gave me a stomach ache.
I just fought the browsers for two days to get my interface working
with all the mouseup and mousedown stuff. I eventually got it all
working, but only on Windows. I have not tested the Mac browsers yet.
I'll be interested in what you come up with.
Do you know the list of names? Or are you trying to identify what
might be a name on the page (say two words in a row with initial
caps)?
On Feb 23, 12:35 pm, sspboyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Dave,
I want to find specific names (I have a list of 320 names in an xml
file). I want to scan
Not sure this is 100% jQuery's problem.
I do this:
$(#logo).html(img src='images/logosmall.gif' alt='logopic' /);
But what lands in the browser is this:
div id=logoimg src=images/logosmall.gif alt=logopic/div
Interestingly, the single quotes have been converted to double quotes
and the
the quotes, '/' or other delimiters as each of the
elements now exists as a node, not as some textual representation.
Karl Rudd
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 10:52 AM, timothytoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not sure this is 100% jQuery's problem.
I do this:
$(#logo).html(img src='images
I think you're having trouble with a closure. It's a common problem
and I recently got help on it myself.
JavaScript looks like C, but it's not C (or Java). You'll probably
keep running into this kind of thing until you understand closures, so
go ahead and search for javascript closure on
For most simple cases, I use a prefix of a unary plus to convert
strings to numbers. It's short. It's easy to read once you're used to
doing it. I haven't tested the speed, but it may be faster as well.
typeof(1);
string
typeof(+1);
number
var startmin = (+$(timestartmin).text() ) || 0;
var
) and mitigate the framerate issues in
other ways. It's a shame. No other browser is detrimentally affected
in performance by disallowing text selection.
If this happens to you, you're not nuts, or at least no more nuts than
I am.
On Feb 21, 5:08 pm, timothytoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Returning false
I've just been through this. preventDefault() in mousedown will keep
Firefox from selecting text as you drag.
This mousemove crap is the only place in my code where I check the
browser. I'm sure it depends on the functionality you're trying to
block, but for me it worked something like this
Swedbergwww.englishrules.comwww.learningjquery.com
On Feb 22, 2008, at 10:50 AM, timothytoe wrote:
I battled ie through the night. Ultimately, it won.
There are many ways to address the text selection issue. I found, I
think six solutions on the web. I was heavy into capturing the mouse
Obviously, There was a typo. Fixed:
1.
var i;
for (i=0;i5;i++) {
setTimeout(function() {alert('first '+i);},5000);
}
2.
for (i=0;i5;i++) {
(function(num) {
setTimeout(function() {alert('second '+num);},
. :-)
On Feb 22, 11:06 am, timothytoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's an interesting thing to try.
My problem is a bit more severe because the items I am moving are divs
that actually have p elements attached to them as labels.
Last night I looked at the jQuery solar system...
http
Did you see my recent thread here? My experience has been nightmarish.
On Feb 22, 12:47 pm, jquertil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TT thanks a lot! for this - it works.
Interesting comparison: the jQuery version of my dragger is 23 lines
of code inluding all callbacks.
The plain javascript
I think Google had some gas. There was a giant burp of messages a
short while ago.
On Feb 22, 8:41 am, gh0st [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why does it take so long for a new topic to be posted? It really is
frustrating esp, if you want answers to questions.
JavaScript has really expressive ways to call functions. The first
parentheses hide the function (make it anonymous) and the second
executes the code immediately with the parameter listed. I'm a newbie
myself, but I think that means right now, pass the variable jQuery in
as $ to the function and
able to pass any object as a parameter. A function is an object
in JavaScript and can be passed as a parameter.
It's very powerful.
On Feb 22, 4:39 pm, Nazgulled [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And what exactly it means to hide a function, making it anonymous?
timothytoe wrote:
JavaScript has really
Any time you create a function without a name it's anonymous. Example:
window.setTimeout(function() { alert('Hello world!') }, 60);
On Feb 22, 4:56 pm, Nazgulled [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
timothytoe wrote:
The function doesn't have a name, so it doesn't pollute the namespace,
and it's great
the syntax used of course. I mean, you simply do $.something()
or $.test.abc() and it will work no matter if you coded in the first
way or second...
timothytoe wrote:
Any time you create a function without a name it's anonymous. Example:
window.setTimeout(function() { alert('Hello world
false; };
domNode.get(0).onselectstart = function () { return false; };
}
- Eli Cochran
user interaction developer
ETS, UC Berkeley
On Feb 20, 5:23 pm, timothytoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks. I got it to work with 2 preventDefaults (the one for IE and
the one
How do I get the position of a mouse within a div when I'm getting
events from mousemove? If it helps, I'm already including
dimensions.js for the myriad extensions that want it. I understand
that I can get pageX or clientX but what I want is X inside that DIV
where I have mousemove tracking on..
Never mind. The answer has to do with jQuery's $().offset() function.
I got it.
On Feb 21, 12:05 pm, timothytoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do I get the position of a mouse within a div when I'm getting
events from mousemove? If it helps, I'm already including
dimensions.js for the myriad
= function () { return false; };
domNode.get(0).onselectstart = function () { return false; };
}
- Eli Cochran
user interaction developer
ETS, UC Berkeley
On Feb 20, 5:23 pm, timothytoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks. I got it to work with 2 preventDefaults (the one for IE
.
$(#actionSurface).mousemove(function(e){
... save off current x and y ...
... move shit around
return false; --- add this
});
-- Josh
- Original Message -
From: timothytoe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: jQuery (English) jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008
Safari for Windows is a pretty good browser now, especially if you
want to have a good idea whether you'll run on Mac Safari (and
iPhone). Is there a reason you're not testing with it as well?
On Feb 20, 3:45 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Admittedly, the function in question is
looks the same in Safari as in Firefox ie (phew!).
So what's up with Opera?
On Feb 21, 1:54 am, timothytoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Safari for Windows is a pretty good browser now, especially if you
want to have a good idea whether you'll run on Mac Safari (and
iPhone). Is there a reason
I remember when Shadow of the Beast came out on the Amiga. Crappy
gameplay, but great parallax scrolling.
This is a great effect. Old Disney films used this well.
Looks like 4 layers there. Anyone look at the code yet? Is there
Javascript controlling the positioning or is it all CSS?
On Feb
Why has dimensions not been dragged into the core jQuery library? So
many plug-ins seem to want it that we end up with html files all over
the web that ask for dimensions, slowing the loading of the page.
On Feb 17, 4:39 am, Nazgulled [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@Eric Martin
I took your
:26 pm, timothytoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why has dimensions not been dragged into the core jQuery library? So
many plug-ins seem to want it that we end up with html files all over
the web that ask for dimensions, slowing the loading of the page.
On Feb 17, 4:39 am, Nazgulled [EMAIL
I just tried Komodo. Very nifty. I like how it checks JavaScript
syntax and does word completion. The jQuery plugin that comes with it
is old. Is there a newer one? It also is missing a PHP plugin. Where
is the locations for those plugins it uses?
Is the Komodo IDE worth the money?
Still love
Nevermind about the PHP. It couldn't find my PHP.exe, which was in
WAMP5. Still think it's kind of lame that the jQuery support is for
jQuery1.1.
On Feb 14, 7:30 am, timothytoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just tried Komodo. Very nifty. I like how it checks JavaScript
syntax and does word
I searched google for jquery autocompletion and was overwhelmed by
the choices. Looks like people have been borrowing heavily back and
forth to get the best solution.
Has anyone gone through the choices recently and selected one? If so,
which did you choose and why?
I'd like to use it for both
I tried a bunch and ended up with PSPad.
One thing I've been wondering about animate. Can you create a function
for the path that something moves along?
On Feb 13, 10:44 am, Karl Swedberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone,
I don't usually announce to this list when I post something on
learningjquery.com, but I figured it might
to see future
development and support.
On Feb 13, 6:47 pm, timothytoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I searched google for jquery autocompletion and was overwhelmed by
the choices. Looks like people have been borrowing heavily back and
forth to get the best solution.
Has anyone gone
It's good practice to at least know where the danger areas might be in
the upcoming browsers. The more people who see these problems, the
better chance we have that something crucial (like detection that the
page is ready to mess with) doesn't cream a fair number of our
scripts.
I check my
This is worth a little more discussion. You're saying that we can use
a div to hold variables, then jQuery can naturally deal with them.
That kinda blows my mind. I'm not sure it would be very speedy, but it
seems very flexible.
On Feb 9, 12:41 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
Besides the Metadata plugin, there's also a plugin called Collection
that looks interesting.
http://plugins.jquery.com/project/Collection
Just what is a jQuery collection that we pass along into jQuery? I
feel like I'm missing something to be able to use jQuery for my own
data.
On Feb 9, 8:43 am, cbmtrx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks lihao.
Actually, there are cases when there would be more than one newdiv
following an
According to that test, array and join is almost 6 times as fast as
string concat in my browser (Firefox on Vista).
On Feb 6, 4:37 pm, J Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've heard a few people mention the building an array and then
using .join(''). I found that good-old-fashioned string
Thanks for all the examples. I was able to find a couple ways on my
own, but I love to see how other people solve these problems so I can
learn new techniques.
Hardest thing for me when in JavaScript is taking my mind out of C and
PHP. Shared syntax is a blessing and a curse.
I ended up using this. I liked it much better than my previous
solution (passing in this and then stripping the digit out in the
handler).
$.each( [0,1,2,3,4], function(index, num) {
$(#port+num).click(function() { bigchart(num); });
});
This one is easy for me to read, comprehend, and
'...'c'
});
On Jan 31, 3:40 pm, timothytoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$.each( [0,1,2,3,4], function(index, num) {
$(#port+num).click(function() { bigchart(num); });
});
Wait. What's the index in there for. I don't need that, do I? Seems
to work fine without it. I'll assume
This code works...
$(#port0).click(function() {bigchart(0)});
$(#port1).click(function() {bigchart(1)});
$(#port2).click(function() {bigchart(2)});
$(#port3).click(function() {bigchart(3)});
$(#port4).click(function() {bigchart(4)});
Naturally, I want to do this:
var
I think I submitted a half-done version of this message by accident a
few minutes ago. Sorry.
This works:
$(#port0).click(function() {bigchart(0)});
$(#port1).click(function() {bigchart(1)});
$(#port2).click(function() {bigchart(2)});
$(#port3).click(function() {bigchart(3)});
Have you tried Firebug's profiler? That's what I use.
On Jan 19, 12:39 pm, cjl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any way to 'profile' the javascript as I try to optimize it,
to find out where the slow bits are?
-CJL
If Firebug is new to you, you're about to fall in love.
Be sure to check out the various online tutorials.
On Jan 19, 5:03 pm, cjl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, TT, thank you, firebug is exactly what I was looking for!
-CJL
It would be cool if shift-mousewheel or alt-mousewheel did that. The
trick is you'd always have to tell the user how to do it.
The touchpad on my laptop allows horizontal scrolling if you drag left-
and-right along the bottom of the page, so it would be nice if jQuery
could pick that up. And my
I ended up upgrading my Vista computer to XP.
On Jan 17, 4:33 pm, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or an even better solution (if it works in your case) might be this
approach rather than totally diabling the UAC:
It's reasonably easy to get it down to a zipcode. But beyond that I
don't think it's possible. IPs are way too dynamic.
--tt
On Jan 17, 6:12 pm, Glen Lipka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, research on this topic has just left me desperate.
I need to find a commercial company that provides a
Beta testers: How stable is this? Should I switch from 1.2.1 yet?
On Jan 14, 8:23 pm, Up-Works [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://code.google.com/p/jqueryjs/downloads/detail?name=jquery-1.2.2
What problems are you having specifically? I know there is a subpixel
rendering problem.
I'm assuming the subpixel rendering is what is causing the ugly black
lines on the left and right side of the border:1 display: inline
example.
I'd probably use this if the IE problem gets fixed. Very
I have a JS app that does a lot of calculations. I'm having trouble
keeping the browser responsive. My current solution is to take apart
loops that last a long time and make them into functions that call
themselves with setTimeout(). (As far as I can tell, you HAVE to do
this to keep the browser
Somehow I missed you reply and started another similar thread today.
Sorry. I'm still getting used to Google Groups.
I have an application that is very processor-intensive. It can takes
up to a minute to run. In order to keep the browser from bringing up a
dialog that asks the user if he or she wants to bail, I break the work
into chunks that are chained together with setTimout().
I'm having trouble getting
Chicks dig it.
On Jan 3, 4:17 pm, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ream Men just have to know...
How does developing in FF increase you reproductivity ?
:o)
Rick
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Eridius
There is a three-IE package, I believe, that runs multiple IEs under
Wine in Linux. I know that a few people use that.
--TT
On Jan 3, 3:07 pm, cfdvlpr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do you test in both IE 6 and IE 7? Are you able to install both
these on the same machine or do you have more
Who are the 1.6% of people using IE5? Do those people actually expect
Web 2.0 sites to work?
It's silly to rail against standards. Yes, we still have to support
IE6. But IE8 is moving towards standards compliance and eventually
that's what we'll be writing for. We know how this game works. New
features show up in new browsers, but we can't use them for a few
years until the new browsers
95 matches
Mail list logo
