[jQuery] Re: A jQuery success story

2007-07-23 Thread Mike Fern
Great story Mike, At the first time I saw jquery, I immediately said, Wow! This is state of the art. I'm also sure there are more people with success stories using jquery. Regards, -Another- Mike

[jQuery] Re: A jQuery success story

2007-07-20 Thread Ganeshji Marwaha
That is good news and BTW a heart-touching story -GTG On 7/20/07, Brandon Aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Excellent! Be sure and ping the list if you need any help with the presentation. I believe there are several people on the list who have recently given a similar presentation to their

[jQuery] Re: A jQuery success story

2007-07-20 Thread Sean Catchpole
A Great Story Michael, thank you. ~Sean

[jQuery] Re: A jQuery success story

2007-07-20 Thread Christopher Jordan
This is awesome, Michael! Great work! And keep spreading the jQuery goodness around. :o) Chris On 7/20/07, Sean Catchpole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A Great Story Michael, thank you. ~Sean -- http://cjordan.us

[jQuery] Re: A jQuery success story

2007-07-20 Thread Glen Lipka
That's awesome. One minor note: Convinced by my arguments and eulogising, I think you meant evangelizing. Unless you were declaring that old javascript programming is dead. In which case, eulogizing is perfect. :) jQuery has changed alot of our lives. In the recent survey, it was asked: How

[jQuery] Re: A jQuery success story

2007-07-20 Thread Michael Price
Well, the old ways ARE dead to me now - I can't think of a situation where I'll ever need to write regular old JavaScript again :) But I DID look up eulogise before I posted just to make sure it would be an appropriate word and I think, from the definitions I found, I got away with it either

[jQuery] Re: A jQuery success story

2007-07-20 Thread Dan G. Switzer, II
Well, the old ways ARE dead to me now - I can't think of a situation where I'll ever need to write regular old JavaScript again :) But I DID look up eulogise before I posted just to make sure it would be an appropriate word and I think, from the definitions I found, I got away with it either way