ExtJS is designed to play together since most of the plugins are designed by
the ExtJS team. I was excited to start play with it however in the end
really did not like it. One thing is that it high a bit of a learning curve
were as with jQuery I was able to start coding very very quickly.
Another reason why jQuery is for me and a better choice in my opinion is the
license. Believe released under the MIT license allow me to include this in
my PHP Framework I am building which will allow me to bring some very nice
built-in feature to it.
Kaare Rasmussen-3 wrote:
Inspired by
http://ui.jquery.com
On 12月3日, 下午8时36分, Kaare Rasmussen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Inspired by this Christmas Calendar
(http://catalyst.perl.org/calendar/2007/1) i want to ask for input regarding
ExtJS vs. jQuery.
The ExtJS overview and demos are very straight forward and rather impressive
Looks good, but perhaps not quite there yet. E.g. no edit option for the
tablesorter.
Also, it was incredible slow on Konqueror (Safari engine).
http://ui.jquery.com
On 12月3日, 下午8时36分, Kaare Rasmussen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Inspired by this Christmas Calendar
I really see them as totally different tools that actually can be used
together in parallel.
One developer said, We use ExtJS for the widgets and the Framework and
jQuery for all the basic interactivity.
I actually think this is a great model. I can't program a single
click-handler in ExtJS. I
Glen Lipka schrieb:
I really see them as totally different tools that actually can be used
together in parallel.
One developer said, We use ExtJS for the widgets and the Framework
and jQuery for all the basic interactivity.
I actually think this is a great model. I can't program a single
@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: ExtJS
Looks good, but perhaps not quite there yet. E.g. no edit option for the
tablesorter.
Also, it was incredible slow on Konqueror (Safari engine).
http://ui.jquery.com
On 12月3日, 下午8时36分, Kaare Rasmussen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Inspired
Rasmussen
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 10:58 AM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: ExtJS
Looks good, but perhaps not quite there yet. E.g. no edit option for the
tablesorter.
Also, it was incredible slow on Konqueror (Safari engine).
http://ui.jquery.com
On 12月3日, 下午8时36分, Kaare
@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kaare Rasmussen
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 10:58 AM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: ExtJS
Looks good, but perhaps not quite there yet. E.g. no edit option for the
tablesorter.
Also, it was incredible slow
It's worth noting here that if you are only using small parts of Ext then
download a custom EXT because it is quite a bloat when you've got
everything, but otherwise EXT is fantastic at creating UI's
On 05/10/2007, NccWarp9 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This thing looks asome.
On Oct 4, 9:08
This thing looks asome.
On Oct 4, 9:08 pm, Steve Brownlee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brook:
Yes, and it's a match made in heaven because jQuery is, in my opinion,
unmatched at DOM traversing, event handling and element manipulation.
Ext, as you notice when you're drooling, is by far the
I find that they play very well together. I use the jquery adapter built to
bridge jquery and ExtJs, but it isn't a necessity, ExtJS has it's own DOM
selector methods. I just find the JQuery syntax very easy, and it's handling
of DOM manipulation very robust. I use ExtJS primarily for it's
Brook:
Yes, and it's a match made in heaven because jQuery is, in my opinion,
unmatched at DOM traversing, event handling and element manipulation.
Ext, as you notice when you're drooling, is by far the best framework
for making things pretty.
As for working together, as long as you download
13 matches
Mail list logo
