On Aug 23, 10:16 pm, Karl Swedberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 23, 2007, at 4:16 AM, R. Rajesh Jeba Anbiah wrote:
On Aug 23, 1:03 am, Karl Swedberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like jTip for all the same reasons, I really like the arrow, and
wish Karl's had it
It does have it if you
On Aug 24, 2007, at 10:11 AM, R. Rajesh Jeba Anbiah wrote:
Thanks for the note, Rajesh!
The deal with the arrows option is that it dynamically sets the
background-position property of the clueTip. You still have to
include a reference to the arrow background images in the css.
snip
On Aug 24, 2007, at 12:56 AM, Shelane Enos wrote:
Karl,
I’ve been really excited to see the progression of this plugin.
It’s looking really great and there has been a lot of wonderful
feedback. I think it’s one of the best documented plugins I’ve
seen. I don’t see a “remaining
On Aug 23, 1:03 am, Karl Swedberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like jTip for all the same reasons, I really like the arrow, and
wish Karl's had it
It does have it if you set the option for it. See my reply to Kim.
snip
FWIW, when I tried one of the svn version, the arrows option
wasn't
On Aug 22, 2007, at 11:36 PM, Rey Bango wrote:
@Karl: What I would suggest is that if the fx is left out,
default to using show() as opposed to fadeIn() and then on line
340, change this line:
$cluetip.hide()[defaults.fx.open](defaults.fx.openSpeed);
to
Karl, if it poses any issues, you can just ensure that you document
show as the option for immediate display and no effects.
Rey...
Karl Swedberg wrote:
On Aug 22, 2007, at 11:36 PM, Rey Bango wrote:
@Karl: What I would suggest is that if the fx is left out, default
to using show() as
On Aug 23, 2007, at 4:16 AM, R. Rajesh Jeba Anbiah wrote:
On Aug 23, 1:03 am, Karl Swedberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like jTip for all the same reasons, I really like the arrow, and
wish Karl's had it
It does have it if you set the option for it. See my reply to Kim.
snip
FWIW,
On Aug 22, 2007, at 11:01 PM, Mitchell Waite wrote:
Now I am sure j Tip is faster, but faster might not be the right
word. Its like this. The very first time I hover over your cluetip
I can actually see the divs and such being assembled. jTip doesn’t
have that flaw, it comes up whole.
Okay,
Karl,
I¹ve been really excited to see the progression of this plugin. It¹s
looking really great and there has been a lot of wonderful feedback. I
think it¹s one of the best documented plugins I¹ve seen. I don¹t see a
³remaining issues² list. How far are we from going 1.0? Can¹t wait :-)
You could always just drop in bgiframe to fix the IE6 select z-index issues.
http://jquery.com/plugins/project/bgiframe/
--
Brandon Aaron
On 8/22/07, Kim Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Karl,
There are two major reasons why I am using JTip:
1. You had posted a fix for the select issue
I like jTip for all the same reasons, I really like the arrow, and wish
Karl's had it and I think it's faster than Karl's. But, and this is big one,
there is some problem with IE7 in jTip that shifts the position of your
tooltip to the right, so I had to drop it.
-Original Message-
From:
On Aug 22, 2007, at 2:45 PM, Kim Johnson wrote:
There are two major reasons why I am using JTip:
1. You had posted a fix for the select issue (select
boxes showing up above the tooltip), which directly
affects how I'm using the box so I need this
functionality
Hi Kim. I know I did this for
I like jTip for all the same reasons, I really like the arrow, and
wish
Karl's had it
It does have it if you set the option for it. See my reply to Kim.
and I think it's faster than Karl's.
Can you explain what you mean by faster? How are you benchmarking
this? Is the speed difference
One last thing Karl. Side by side your cluetips take longer to appear then
jTips do. About 1/2 second slower on this rig but that is a critical period
that should be fast. Again this is me, maybe others like them slow.
On Aug 22, 2007, at 5:07 PM, Mitchell Waite wrote:
One last thing Karl. Side by side your cluetips take longer to
appear then
jTips do. About 1/2 second slower on this rig but that is a
critical period
that should be fast. Again this is me, maybe others like them slow.
You know, Mitch, I
Man thats great customer service. I will put a high rating on your
satisfaction survey :)
I'm not home right now so I can't test the performance of the custom
demo but will let you know.
On the custom demo if you alternate between the two example links,
eventually the left link developes a gap
Swedberg
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 6:22 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Karl, cluetip questions: Select IE6 bug ETA, and
incorporating JTIP?
On Aug 22, 2007, at 5:07 PM, Mitchell Waite wrote:
One last thing Karl. Side by side your cluetips take longer to appear
.
Mitch
*From:* jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*On Behalf Of *Karl Swedberg
*Sent:* Wednesday, August 22, 2007 6:22 PM
*To:* jquery-en@googlegroups.com
*Subject:* [jQuery] Re: Karl, cluetip questions: Select IE6 bug ETA, and
incorporating JTIP?
On Aug 22
, August 22, 2007 6:22 PM
*To:* jquery-en@googlegroups.com
*Subject:* [jQuery] Re: Karl, cluetip questions:
Select IE6 bug ETA, and
incorporating JTIP?
On Aug 22, 2007, at 5:07 PM, Mitchell Waite wrote:
One last thing Karl. Side by side your
cluetips take
: [jQuery] Re: Karl, cluetip questions: Select IE6 bug ETA, and
incorporating JTIP?
Mitchell,
I believe what you're seeing is the slide down effect that's an option
in clueTip.
If you want to get around that just do something like this:
$('#cfvhelp').cluetip({width: 200, cluetipClass: 'jtip
@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rey Bango
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 8:36 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Karl, cluetip questions: Select IE6 bug ETA, and
incorporating JTIP?
Mitchell,
I believe what you're seeing is the slide down effect that's
21 matches
Mail list logo
