wow, thats a neat idea...
All is well and good, but when i see safari, i understand that it has far
more problems (in terms of bugs and standards compliance) than firefox. So,
won't we be writing incompatible css code when we write for webkit.
One more thing, if the webkit plugin is used to
Ganeshji Marwaha wrote:
wow, thats a neat idea...
All is well and good, but when i see safari, i understand that it has
far more problems (in terms of bugs and standards compliance) than
firefox. So, won't we be writing incompatible css code when we write for
webkit.
Safari was the first
Hi,
I wanted to comment your blogpost, but could not register. Anyway.
http://commadot.com/?p=581
I would love your thoughts on it.
I don't understand, why people think that this idea is so great, but i'm not
100% shure if I have really understood it.
Do you whant to use a HTML rendering
Hi Christof
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Christof Donat
Gesendet: Montag, 30. Juli 2007 11:53
An: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Betreff: [jQuery] Re: OT: A Big Idea
Hi,
I wanted to comment your blogpost
-en@googlegroups.com
Betreff: [jQuery] Re: OT: A Big Idea
Hi,
I wanted to comment your blogpost, but could not register. Anyway.
http://commadot.com/?p=581
I would love your thoughts on it.
I don't understand, why people think that this idea is so
great, but i'm not 100
Hi,
1. The web has never been designed to give you exactly the
same results everywhere. It has been designed to give the
user the best possible access to the information independent
from his eventual disabilities. Use the tool as it is and
don't complain that your hammer is not a saw.
Hi,
1. Allow the publisher to determine which rendering engine to display the
page in.
Exactly this is what I don't whant to see and I do think that I have good
reasons.
Think about sIFR. It works because it's unobtrusive and relies on a plugin
that everyone has.
Well, most people. How
sIFR does not break aural readers at all.
It takes normal HTML and it pushes it into a flash movie (if flash is there)
and shows it with the flash font. Still selectable, copyable. The user
actually can not tell the difference at all. Screen readers read the html,
not the flash. Its
care and would even
welcome it.
And it would certainly be great for developers.
Rick
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Glen Lipka
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 12:01 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: AW: [jQuery] Re: OT: A Big
Hi,
sIFR does not break aural readers at all.
It takes normal HTML and it pushes it into a flash movie (if flash is
there) and shows it with the flash font.
So we can not count on an exact visual representation - only if flash player
is installed. What do we gain then? Is the flash player
Sounds good to me!
One rendering environment to rule them all!
Rick
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Glen Lipka
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 9:33 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] OT: A Big Idea
AjaxExperience was a
A dream come true! Looks like this just showed up on Ajaxian.
--
Brandon Aaron
On 7/27/07, Glen Lipka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AjaxExperience was a blast. So many good people and presentations. The
meetup was alot of fun!
At the end of today was this great brain-storming session.
I wrote
Glen,
I love the idea; where would you prefer the comments to be left, here or at
your site? I have a few, but want to keep them grouped together with others
peoples.
Thanks.
On 7/27/07, Brandon Aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A dream come true! Looks like this just showed up on Ajaxian.
--
Umm. I guess the blog. Probably good to keep it with the post.
Glen
On 7/27/07, Benjamin Sterling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Glen,
I love the idea; where would you prefer the comments to be left, here or
at your site? I have a few, but want to keep them grouped together with
others
That is what I thought, just wanted to make sure.
On 7/28/07, Glen Lipka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Umm. I guess the blog. Probably good to keep it with the post.
Glen
On 7/27/07, Benjamin Sterling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Glen,
I love the idea; where would you prefer the comments to
15 matches
Mail list logo
