Your statement is inaccurate. The YUI Compressor does NOT add any
overhead at load time or at runtime, unlike Packer.
Regards,
Julien (author of the YUI Compressor)
On Sep 11, 4:24 pm, Stephan Beal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 12, 12:59 am, Web Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm
Eridius wrote:
The tabs don't work since they use .eq() function(ofcourse you just need the
1.1 patch js and it works fine)
The reason they don't work is because there is UI Tabs (aka Tabs 3) now
that works fine with jQuery 1.2 - I'm not planning to update the Tabs 2
branch any longer.
PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Rey Bango
Sent: mardi 11 septembre 2007 22:44
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: jquery 1.2 feedback
Well, if John won't take credit for the speed increases, then, I
WILL
Yeah, I tweaked the ternary conditions across a same origin dynamic
I'm using Jorn's Form Validation in a monster form. Using jQuery
1.2minified version returns all validation in =~ 16 sec. Using
uncompressed
version returns in 6 sec.
Hi, somewhat unrelated to the thread: 6 or even 16 secs seem like an
eternity. What would be the disadvantages of using
Tom Sieron' wrote:
On 9/12/07, Justin Sepulveda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Curious, would the speed increases come from using the minified
version verses the packer version?
I've recently stumbled upon such an opinion :
Rey Bango wrote:
Well, if John won't take credit for the speed increases, then, I WILL
Yeah, I tweaked the ternary conditions across a same origin dynamic
object literal expression while templating the script using Purple
Include like techniques.
That's what sped it up! Enjoy! ;)
But
Just to add real quick.. I also have not had ANY issues come up with
1.2 yet. Used the compatibility plugin all is working phenomenally.
Couldn't be happier. Thanks jQuery team!
On Sep 11, 5:26 pm, Alexandre Plennevaux [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
just wanted to report that i had absolutely not a
Bernd Matzner schrieb:
I'm using Jorn's Form Validation in a monster form. Using jQuery
1.2minified version returns all validation in =~ 16 sec. Using
uncompressed
version returns in 6 sec.
Hi, somewhat unrelated to the thread: 6 or even 16 secs seem like an
eternity. What would be
-Original Message-
From: Rey Bango [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ajaxian.com/archives/purple-include-19
Rey...
Web Specialist wrote:
Hey Rey: what's Purple Include?
Ha! And here I thought you made it up :)
That looks really cool!
Jim
;)
Priest, James (NIH/NIEHS) [C] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Rey Bango [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ajaxian.com/archives/purple-include-19
Rey...
Web Specialist wrote:
Hey Rey: what's Purple Include?
Ha! And here I thought you made it up :)
That looks really cool!
BTW ... the same functionality can now be achieved with jQuery 1.2 and the
update .load() method.
http://docs.jquery.com/Ajax/load#urldatacallback
--
Brandon Aaron
On 9/12/07, Priest, James (NIH/NIEHS) [C] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Rey Bango [mailto:[EMAIL
I would like to report also a 100% no-conflict upgrade to 1.2! Thanks
for the hard work and the quick output.
That being said, I can't get offset() to work like expected. I use
Dimensions offset() on my site in a tricky situation involving floats,
padding, margin, etc. I tried to switch into
You'll have to ask Brandon, as .offset() is his baby. The core offset
doesn't take any options (unlike the old one in Dimensions). However,
this new offset is now the default way to check for offset - Brandon
has removed it from Dimensions in favor of just maintaining the one in
core.
--John
On
In the transition of moving the new offset method into the core some bugs
showed up. I've addressed these issues in the latest SVN of jQuery and they
will be included in the upcoming jQuery 1.2.1. If you wouldn't mind grabbing
the latest code from SVN and seeing if that works for your site, that
Thanks for the quick replies, guys, I'll check out the fix ASAP. I'm
assuming then that the new offset() covers for all supported browsers,
and returns correct offset even with borders, margin, padding, etc.?
jQuery.extend(true, Awesome, uber) !
Charles
On Sep 12, 3:13 pm, Brandon Aaron [EMAIL
i also had a no conflict upgrade and a little speed enhancement...
thought there's a problem with animate bg new feature...
On Sep 12, 11:37 pm, polyrhythmic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to report also a 100% no-conflict upgrade to 1.2! Thanks
for the hard work and the quick output.
Did you remember to include the color animation plugin?
--John
On 9/12/07, Equand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i also had a no conflict upgrade and a little speed enhancement...
thought there's a problem with animate bg new feature...
On Sep 12, 11:37 pm, polyrhythmic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
just wanted to report that i had absolutely not a single issue switching
from 1.1.4 to 1.2 and i use tons of plugins.
The speed gain for me is more obvious with this release than with the move
from 1.1.3 to 1.1.4. Also, animations and effects are smoother.
Interesting - I've now heard this
@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rey Bango
Sent: mardi 11 septembre 2007 22:44
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: jquery 1.2 feedback
Well, if John won't take credit for the speed increases, then, I WILL
Yeah, I tweaked the ternary conditions across
using Purple Include
like techniques ?
:D
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rey Bango
Sent: mardi 11 septembre 2007 22:44
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: jquery 1.2 feedback
Well, if John won't take
PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rey Bango
Sent: mardi 11 septembre 2007 22:44
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: jquery 1.2 feedback
Well, if John won't take credit for the speed increases, then, I WILL
Yeah, I tweaked the ternary conditions across a same origin dynamic
On 9/12/07, Justin Sepulveda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Curious, would the speed increases come from using the minified
version verses the packer version?
I've recently stumbled upon such an opinion :
http://www.julienlecomte.net/blog/2007/08/21/gzip-your-minified-javascript-files/
Could
I'm using Jorn's Form Validation in a monster form. Using jQuery
1.2minified version returns all validation in =~ 16 sec. Using
uncompressed
version returns in 6 sec. Comparing with an older version I don't have any
improvement.
Cheers
2007/9/11, Tom Sieroń [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 9/12/07,
-en@googlegroups.com
mailto:jquery-en@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Rey Bango
Sent: mardi 11 septembre 2007 22:44
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com mailto:jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: jquery 1.2 feedback
Well, if John won't take credit for the speed
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rey Bango
Sent: mardi 11 septembre 2007 22:44
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: jquery 1.2 feedback
Well, if John won't take credit for the speed increases, then, I WILL
Yeah, I
On Sep 12, 12:59 am, Web Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm using Jorn's Form Validation in a monster form. Using jQuery
1.2minified version returns all validation in =~ 16 sec. Using
uncompressed
version returns in 6 sec. Comparing with an older version I don't have any
improvement.
Thanks Stephan for the uber descriptive explanation. Very helpful.
On Sep 11, 4:24 pm, Stephan Beal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 12, 12:59 am, Web Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm using Jorn's Form Validation in a monster form. Using jQuery
1.2minified version returns all
The tabs don't work since they use .eq() function(ofcourse you just need the
1.1 patch js and it works fine)
Alexandre Plennevaux wrote:
just wanted to report that i had absolutely not a single issue switching
from 1.1.4 to 1.2 and i use tons of plugins.
The speed gain for me is more
28 matches
Mail list logo
