.
And as I said in the tutorial, it's only the first part of a serie
focused on creating a os web interface, just that hehe.
On Dec 16, 11:57 pm, Rick Faircloth r...@whitestonemedia.com
wrote:
D'oh! :o)
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
I'm making another attempt to get Jorn's validation plug-in working.
I'm getting this error from Firebug after clicking in the first required field
then out
(onfocusout):
validator.settings[on + event.type].call is not a function
(function($) {$.extend($.fn,{validate:fun...cured when checking
Your reduction works well, Dave...thanks.
As far as the subject line... I had [Validate] at the beginning of it,
which is what Jorn requested if the email has to do with his plug-in.
Did [Validate] get stripped out?
And concerning the error, it's got to do with the validation events.
I'm
Here's the code that I'd like to make flexible to handle
all the input id's and error message id's. How could I write it?
Thanks,
Rick
$('input#street_number').blur(function() {
if (this.value.length == 0)
Nope...I guess Google strips it out...
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:jquery...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Dave Methvin
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2008 3:43 PM
To: jQuery (English)
Subject: [jQuery] Re: What is causing this error?
Did
Don't know if that's the best phrasing for the subject,
but what I'm trying to do is develop some code that
will work for all for inputs of type 'text', instead
of hard-coding the id values.
The original code is this:
$('input#street_number').blur(function() {
if
== ) {
$(# + this.id + _error).fadeIn(500);
}
else {
$(# + this.id + _error).fadeOut(500);
}
$(#submit).attr(disabled, (val == ) ? disabled : );
});
On Dec 22, 1:10 pm, Rick Faircloth r...@whitestonemedia.com wrote:
Don't know if that's
, (val == ) ? disabled : );
});
On Dec 22, 1:10 pm, Rick Faircloth r...@whitestonemedia.com wrote:
Don't know if that's the best phrasing for the subject,
but what I'm trying to do is develop some code that
will work for all for inputs of type 'text', instead
of hard-coding the id
);
}
On Dec 22, 2:21 pm, Rick Faircloth r...@whitestonemedia.com wrote:
I see in your example code that you're still using a hard-coded name
for the input. I'd like it completely generalized for all variables.
I'm working towards creating code for categories of input types: text
Thanks, Kean and Dave, for your code suggestions and feedback.
And, Dave...yes, I would have preferred, actually, to use Jorn's
validation plug-in, but could not figure out a way to cause
it to validate on blur. Jorn has set up the default validation
to occur after a form is submitted, but I
);
$(#submit).attr('disabled', checkAllRequired() ? null :
disabled);
});
});
On Dec 22, 3:54 pm, Rick Faircloth r...@whitestonemedia.com wrote:
Ok...after a lot of experimentation, I've got a solution
that's working to the point that I've attempted to implement it.
Here's
:
$(':input.required')
Karl Rudd
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Rick Faircloth
r...@whitestonemedia.com wrote:
How can this:
// all the required text fields
var $required = $('input.required:text');
be expanded to include 'input.required:select' ?
I tried all
at 2:54 PM, Rick Faircloth
r...@whitestonemedia.com wrote:
D'oh! I can't believe it was that simple!
And I read everything I could find, including the docs on selectors.
(Should have read it twice, I guess...)
Anyway, question, Karl, et al...
How can I validate a select input
/validate )
According to the documentation to suppress validation on submission
all you need to do is:
$('form').validate({
onsubmit: false
});
Note: I've never used the plugin before, so this is all untested.
Karl Rudd
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Rick Faircloth
r
Hi, Giovanni...
I don't have an answer to your specific question, but I do have a question
for you, if you don't mind.
I've been trying to use Jorn's Validate plug-in, as well, and trying to
get it to validate onblur or onfocusout. Have you been able to accomplish
this?
Rick
-Original
Thanks, Jorn... I'll check it out.
Rick
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:jquery...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Jörn Zaefferer
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2008 9:42 AM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: [validate plugin] How to call
Hi, Jorn, et al...
How can I adjust this plug-in code to validate only on blur?
Thanks,
Rick
script type=text/javascript
$(document).ready(function() {
$('#add-rental-property-form').validate({
errorPlacement: function(error, element) {
Is this legit?
$(':input[class$=required]')
I know it'll work for a div:
$('div[class$=required]')
but it doesn't seem to work to designate an input
with a class that has required on the end of it's name...
Rick
I'd like to take a peek...what's the URL?
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:jquery...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Althalos
Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2008 3:54 AM
To: jQuery (English)
Subject: [jQuery] Re: working in FF but not in IE
I really
?
$('input.required') would be faster.
On Dec 24, 1:52 am, Rick Faircloth r...@whitestonemedia.com wrote:
Is this legit?
$(':input[class$=required]')
I know it'll work for a div:
$('div[class$=required]')
but it doesn't seem to work to designate an input
with a class that has required
And from the US!
Merry Christmas, everyone!
Rick
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:jquery...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of diego valobra
Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2008 9:55 AM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: R: [jQuery] Merry Xmass
Merry Xmas to all the
Well done!
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:jquery...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of MorningZ
Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2008 10:29 AM
To: jQuery (English)
Subject: [jQuery] Re: How do I make a partial textarea autocomplete?
Super quick proof of
Hi, all...
I'm cloning a section of code to create additional image
inputs in a form, along with a yes/no select field.
When the cloning occurs, I also need to increment the field
names of the select statement (main-photo-1, main-photo-2, etc.),
and the file input field (image-upload-1,
in this code incrementing?
('#main-photo-next :last').name
You're missing the $/jQuery and trying to get a property that doesn't
exist.
change that to $(this).attr('name').replace(...) and you're set.
On Dec 29, 1:36 am, Rick Faircloth r...@whitestonemedia.com wrote:
Hi, all...
I'm
?
('#main-photo-next :last').name
You're missing the $/jQuery and trying to get a property that doesn't
exist.
change that to $(this).attr('name').replace(...) and you're set.
On Dec 29, 1:36 am, Rick Faircloth r...@whitestonemedia.com wrote:
Hi, all...
I'm cloning a section
exist.
change that to $(this).attr('name').replace(...) and you're set.
On Dec 29, 1:36 am, Rick Faircloth r...@whitestonemedia.com wrote:
Hi, all...
I'm cloning a section of code to create additional image
inputs in a form, along with a yes/no select field.
When
Hi, all... and Happy New Year (a little early. US East Coast, 8pm)!
I'm cloning a filefield, and, we'll assume, the user has already
used the browse button to locate a file.
When this filefield is cloned, the file path from the previous field
is still in the new field. I want to empty the
Very nicely done, everyone!
Rick
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:jquery...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Richard D. Worth
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2008 10:03 PM
To: jquery...@googlegroups.com
Cc: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] jQuery UI 1.6rc3 is out
I'm running this code to validate that an entry
into any field with a class of number
is a number after all $,. are disregarded.
I'm not getting any response on my page on blur
for the field.
Is there something wrong with this code?
Thanks,
Rick
$(':input.number').each(function() {
Just a possibility, Randy, but this might be one of those
cases where you could use the LiveQuery plug-in to re-bind
the link after the DOM has been updated with your new HTML.
Check this out and see if it helps you.
http://brandonaaron.net/docs/livequery/
Rick
-Original Message-
Nevermind... I figured out what was wrong.
I needed another / after the bracket to terminate the regex.
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:jquery...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Rick Faircloth
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 10:28 PM
To: jquery-en
the trick.
Thank You!
Randy
On Jan 3, 12:18 am, Rick Faircloth r...@whitestonemedia.com wrote:
Just a possibility, Randy, but this might be one of those
cases where you could use the LiveQuery plug-in to re-bind
the link after the DOM has been updated with your new HTML.
Check
Hi, all...
I'm writing some validation code and have an input
for dollar amounts and would like for users to be able to
enter digits or $ or , or . all of which are commonly
used in US dollar values.
The code I've written should verify that after any $ or , or .
are removed from a user's
] Re: Why would this code not allow a $ as part of the input?
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Rick Faircloth
r...@whitestonemedia.com wrote:
Hi, all...
I'm writing some validation code and have an input
for dollar amounts and would like for users to be able to
enter digits
I'm trying to validate a form.
All the validation I've implemented up to this point
is working fine.
However, I want to be able to scan all required fields
after each field is filled in and see if any required
fields remain to be satisfactorily completed. If there
are any, I want to keep the
3, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Rick Faircloth r...@whitestonemedia.com
wrote:
Thanks for the tips, Brian!
That gave me just the insight I needed.
Here's what I finally ended up with:
if ( isNaN (this.value.replace(/\$|,|\./g,'')))
That disregards any $ or , or . (commonly used US dollar
Anyone?
I'm trying to validate a form.
All the validation I've implemented up to this point
is working fine.
However, I want to be able to scan all required fields
after each field is filled in and see if any required
fields remain to be satisfactorily completed. If there
are any,
it, but you need to dictate the event
handler that is going to do trigger the scanning.
Joe
http://www.subprint.com
On Jan 3, 6:17 pm, Rick Faircloth r...@whitestonemedia.com wrote:
Anyone?
I'm trying to validate a form.
All the validation I've implemented up
On Jan 3, 9:58 pm, Rick Faircloth r...@whitestonemedia.com wrote:
Thanks for the reply, Joe...
To answer your question: I want to check the required fields for any that
are still
invalid after a user blurs out of any required field.
Rick
-Original Message-
From
check all the forms. If it doesn't validate, modify the
DOM to show it to the user. Then _return false_.
That should stop the submit action.
On Jan 4, 2:36 pm, Rick Faircloth r...@whitestonemedia.com wrote:
Thanks, Joe!
Rick
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en
: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:jquery...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Rick Faircloth
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 11:45 AM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Tutorials or examples of jQuery and ColdFusion?
How can I force the processing of ColdFusion code in a menu
segment when I have some login and I replace the menu HTML.
I had some conditional code like:
cfif isdefined(session.announcements) and
session.announcements eq 1
lia
Hi, all...
I prefer to use .fadeIn(500), etc., to bring elements
onto a page, as it gives the user a chance to keep
up with changes being made visually.
However, .fadeIn leaves text looking *u-ga-ly*... changing
.fadeIn to .show leaves text nicely rendered in the browser.
Is there some trick
?
Are you talking about Internet Explorer browser?
If so, have a look in the following article:
http://www.kevinleary.net/blog/jquery-fadein-fadeout-problems-in-internet-explorer/
Maurício
-Mensagem Original-
De: Rick Faircloth r...@whitestonemedia.com
Para: jquery-en
with the
animation.
On Jan 12, 10:09 am, Rick Faircloth r...@whitestonemedia.com
wrote:
Thanks for the reply, Mauricio, but I couldn't get
your solution to work.
Adding the background (at least in IE 7) didn't have any effect
on the display of the final text.
Also, on your demo page, I
to making text at has been faded in look good?
Look at Mike Alsup's solution
On Jan 12, 1:37 pm, Rick Faircloth r...@whitestonemedia.com wrote:
Can you be more specific? Are you saying the filter attribute
causes IE to poorly render fades?
If so, what does your coding solution look
Hi, all...
Why am I getting this error:
missing ; before statement
var tour-info-div = '$('this').prev('.tour-info-div')' ; \n
from this code: ???
$(document).ready(function() {
$('.update_button').click(function(){
= $(this).prev('.update-div');
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Rick Faircloth
r...@whitestonemedia.com wrote:
Hi, all...
Why am I getting this error:
missing ; before statement
var tour-info-div = '$('this').prev('.tour-info-div')' ; \n
from this code: ???
$(document).ready
= '$(\'this\').prev(\'.update-div\')' ;
Use double quote
var tour-info-div = $('this').prev('.tour-info-div');
var update-div = $('this').prev('.update-div');
On Jan 13, 10:25 am, Rick Faircloth r...@whitestonemedia.com
wrote:
Thanks for the reply, Brian, but that didn't solve it.
I
Here's the code that I'm trying to make function
for multiple links on a page with the class of update-link
How would I change this to make it work for the specific
.update-link element that I click?
$(document).ready(function() {
the ticks
$(this)
On Jan 13, 2:50 pm, Rick Faircloth r...@whitestonemedia.com wrote:
Here's the code that I'm trying to make function
for multiple links on a page with the class of update-link
How would I change this to make it work for the specific
.update-link element that I click
next(). Prev and next look at the
sibling level.
-- Josh
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:jquery...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Rick Faircloth
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 12:17 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: How to make
. It will work, but be
warned that FF will generate a warning because return is not inside a function.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Rick Faircloth r...@whitestonemedia.com
wrote:
Thanks, Josh...
You were almost perfect. I just needed to add one more .next to the second
line:
$(this).parent().next
...@gmail.com wrote:
Instead of href=##, put href=javascript: return false. It will work, but be
warned that FF will
generate a warning because return is not inside a function.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Rick Faircloth r...@whitestonemedia.com
wrote:
Thanks, Josh...
You were almost perfect
Starting from the input with the class update-button
in the next to the bottom line of the HTML/CFML below,
I'm trying to traverse one line up to the input with two
classes, the second being the important one, update-input.
I've tried using:
Would it still be referring to the '.update-button that was clicked in the
second line?
Thanks,
Rick
$(document).ready(function() {
$('.update-button').click(function(){
var formval = { tour_url:
This is a completely different part of the problem.
The other parts have been solved, but I couldn't make sense
of the success part.
If you don't want to help, don't respond.
And if you really are concerned about the number of posts,
contribute to making them unnecessary by helping with the
, what would $(this) in the success part
refer to?
If you check the documentation you'll see that this in the success
function will be the options for this ajax request.
http://docs.jquery.com/Ajax/jQuery.ajax#options
Karl Rudd
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Rick Faircloth
r
$(this) in the success part
refer to?
Has it ever occurred to you that maybe, just maybe, people are sick and tired
of helping you when
you refuse to help yourself?
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Rick Faircloth wrote:
This is a completely different part of the problem.
The other parts
to
help yourself first
On Jan 13, 11:33 pm, Matt Quackenbush quackfu...@gmail.com wrote:
Has it ever occurred to you that maybe, just maybe, people are sick and
tired of helping you when you refuse to help yourself?
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Rick Faircloth wrote
MorningZ...
It would be appreciated if you would bother to read the change logs
before asking questions or making any commentary. Obviously, as John
suggested, you haven't bothered to read what has been offered, so what
you have likely done if a more comprehensive change log had been
purposes i wasn't saying everyone felt this way, just me
and if that doesn't matter much... oh f__cking well... i'll continue
using 1.2.6, which i'm perfectly content with
On Jan 14, 12:02 am, Rick Faircloth r...@whitestonemedia.com
wrote:
MorningZ...
It would be appreciated
$(this) in the success part
refer to?
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Rick Faircloth wrote:
If you are sick and tired of helping me, then don't.
I don't remember having any contract with you.
You couldn't afford a contract with me.
And, fyi, I do help myself
I do read the docs
ignore them. It leads to a lot
less stress, mostly for me :). Trying to explain quantum physics to
someone who's just learning about gravity is usually a recipe for
stress for all involved.
Karl Rudd
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Rick Faircloth
r...@whitestonemedia.com wrote:
I help
Congratulations, John and Paul!
Rick
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:jquery...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Sam Sherlock
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 10:00 AM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: jQuery 1.3 Released
Happy Birthday jQuery, and hats off
Only if you know what it does in the first place.
You can't know the answer before knowing the answer... :o)
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:jquery...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of jQuery Lover
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 8:27 AM
To:
You and I both know, Charlie, from this group and especially from CF-Talk
that there are ways to do encouraging education and then there are ways
to commit discouraging education. It's all in the tone of the reply.
Personally, I think it's time for jQuery to take the route of CF-Talk
and
Matt.
I defy you to find references to where I've asked about the same topic
more than a few times, especially over years. I haven't even been on
the list that long. And where, even once, have I asked someone to write
code for me? Never, except for examples as guides.
And if you'll
Look great!
Rick
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:jquery...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Canglan
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 6:48 AM
To: jQuery (English)
Subject: [jQuery] [Plugin Release] Endless Scroll
Hi guys,
Just thought I'd post this
Try adding return false; to your click code to prevent
normal click response.
hth, Rick
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:jquery...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Alexey
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 9:37 PM
To: jQuery (English)
Subject: [jQuery]
If I want to abort a function based on a condition,
what is the command to do that?
if x == 0
abort this function...
Thanks,
Rick
;
- Original Message -
From: Rick Faircloth r...@whitestonemedia.com
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 2:34:39 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: [jQuery] How do I abort a function?
If I want to abort a function based on a condition,
what is the command to do
I've tried every version of this I can think of (after
checking the docs and Google, etc.), but I can't get this
to work.
Is there something wrong with this syntax? If I check the
radio input whose value=0, why won't this return 0 as the
value?
$('.delete-button').click(function(){
Anyone have any feedback on the code below? Syntax?
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:jquery...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Rick Faircloth
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 3:53 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Is something wrong
which element
of that array to look at.
On Jan 16, 3:52 pm, Rick Faircloth r...@whitestonemedia.com wrote:
I've tried every version of this I can think of (after
checking the docs and Google, etc.), but I can't get this
to work.
Is there something wrong with this syntax? If I check
Hi, James...
Just a thought...do you have format=json as part of the URL that you're calling?
That straightened out the format problem for me when I added that.
What does your ajax code look like?
Rick
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Hi, Mark...
Check into the LiveQuery plug-in and use it on your .click element.
(see the instructions at the plug-in site). You can also use .live function
built into jQuery 1.3, if you're using that. But I understand the .live
function
has some limitations that the LiveQuery doesn't have.
for your response. I've got it working now. I used the
LiveQuery plugin that you recommended. It took a few attempts but I've
finally managed to get it working!
Thanks again. Saved me a *lot* of time!
Mark
On Jan 19, 9:44 pm, Rick Faircloth r...@whitestonemedia.com wrote:
Hi, Mark
Hi, Chris...
Sounds like you need the LiveQuery plug-in. It re-binds actions
to newly inserted DOM elements. Add the LiveQuery plug-in to your
.click elements (or whatever action triggers them) and that will
probably fix your problem.
Look here for the plug-in and instructions.
Forgot to mention...
If you're using jQuery 1.3, there is now a built-in in .live function
that you can use in place of LiveQuery, but it has some limitations for
now that LiveQuery doesn't.
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:jquery...@googlegroups.com] On
Chris
On Jan 20, 1:48 pm, Rick Faircloth r...@whitestonemedia.com wrote:
Forgot to mention...
If you're using jQuery 1.3, there is now a built-in in .live function
that you can use in place of LiveQuery, but it has some limitations for
now that LiveQuery doesn't
I went to take a look at the demo, but all I got
was a page of code...is there a working demo online?
Thanks,
Rick
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:jquery...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of RSol
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 8:42 AM
To: jQuery
all of that back? As now the hover functionality on this
menu does not work. It is based on the superfish menu system
On Jan 20, 3:20 pm, Rick Faircloth r...@whitestonemedia.com wrote:
Here's a good link for you:
http://brandonaaron.net/blog/2007/08/19/new-plugin-live-query
And here's
Hi, Charlie...
I'm not sure of a solution, but I did notice when I compared IE7's generated
source
to FF3's, that IE7 has setting of display:none for the first div contained
inside the div id=ajaxContent.
FF3 has that div coded like this:
div style=display: block; id=general
So, for some
Also, Charlie, if I use IE7's Developer Toolbar to change the
div id=general from display:none to display:block, all the
content shows up normally, as it does in FF3.
Find out what's changing the display attr to display:none and
prevent that and you should be good-to-go...
Rick
-Original
=DISPLAY: none oldblock=block
I am really desparete from this...
On 20 Led, 18:07, Rick Faircloth r...@whitestonemedia.com wrote:
Also, Charlie, if I use IE7's Developer Toolbar to change the
div id=general from display:none to display:block, all the
content shows up normally, as it does
I don't appreciate the humorless disrespect, guys.
I don't know where you're from, but if you're in the US, the one
thing you can say is that POTUS43 kept our butts safe for the
last 8 years. We'll have to see if the new liberal in the White House
has the same guts.
Now, I'll drop this, if you
Anyone have any idea why FF would respond properly to this code
and IE 7 creates different code for this clone?
Here's the original HTML:
div id=image-div
input style=margin-top:20px; margin-bottom:20px; display:block;
class=image-next
name=image-upload-1 type=file size=65 value=
/div
). show(); it works, but if there is
varibale $('#'+anyVariable).show(); IE is loosing value of this
variable after click, thats all problem. But how can I solve it?
On 20 Led, 20:06, Rick Faircloth r...@whitestonemedia.com wrote:
Try specifying display:block as the attribute, instead
jQuery 1.2.6, that is...
Rick
().toLowerCase();
Easy, isnt it? Anyway many thx for your time and tips!!
Cya,
Charlie
On 21 Led, 00:31, Rick Faircloth r...@whitestonemedia.com wrote:
What about forming your clickable link like this:
a id=general href=#General/a
Then write a function based on the id:
$(document
://inf.in-desk.ru/
On 20 янв, 17:27, Rick Faircloth r...@whitestonemedia.com wrote:
I went to take a look at the demo, but all I got
was a page of code...is there a working demo online?
that's a useless pice (sic) of code
Can't you think of a less damning way to that, Ricardo?
Perhaps, I'm not sure what your code is supposed to do. What does
the trigger_form_submit() function do? And I don't see where
any jQuery fits into your code.
See how nice that sounds and still gets
Good stuff, Ricardo!
Rick
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:jquery...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Ricardo Tomasi
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 11:50 PM
To: jQuery (English)
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Syntax similar to IN in SQL
var abc =
I had a problem running some ajax code in IE and
I believe the problem turned out to be having the
console.log(); code in there.
Try commenting that out and see if it runs ok in IE.
Rick
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:jquery...@googlegroups.com] On
This didn't work for me...
$('#test').text().remove();
with this HTML:
div id=test style=width:200px; height:100px; border:1px solid black;test
test/div
However, with this jQuery:
$('#test p:contains()').remove();
and this HTML:
div id=test style=width:200px; height:100px; border:1px
Charlie, are you saying that your links don't work after
an AJAX request places new HTML in your DOM? (in the page?)
Rick
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:jquery...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Charlie22
Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2009 12:19 PM
To:
Hi, all...
I keep getting this error from Firebug:
syntax error
.trigger('change'); \n
for this code:
$(document.ready(function() {
$('#select').change(function() {
var newName =
. To preserve the node but empty
it, set it to an empty string. You have to supply an argument () or
else the behavior becomes 'return the text within the node.'
On Jan 24, 12:28 pm, Rick Faircloth r...@whitestonemedia.com
wrote:
This didn't work for me...
$('#test').text().remove
way as in original document. Isnt posssible adding
Javascript code via ajax?? btw I tested also in success AJAX section
$.getScript from external file, but also no success. Same if I place
it before AJAX request.
On 24 Led, 18:30, Rick Faircloth r...@whitestonemedia.com wrote:
Charlie
401 - 500 of 861 matches
Mail list logo
