Re: [Jruby-devel] Re: PATCH: Various fixes to make RubyGems work, almost

2006-03-26 Thread Charles O Nutter
The changes are committed. Happy day!The FileUtils hack is still necessary to get RubyGems to run, so we'll need a better solution for that, and of course there's still a few bugs with setup.rb and the corrupting of the sources gem...but we're SO CLOSE :) On 3/26/06, Charles O Nutter <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [Jruby-devel] Re: PATCH: Various fixes to make RubyGems work, almost

2006-03-26 Thread Charles O Nutter
The hacks are resolved, and there's one additional fix:- GzipReadline.gets now properly uses the separator param. The impl is slow (character by character InputStream.read calls), but it works.I'll be committing shortly. On 3/26/06, Charles O Nutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Agreed on all points.

Re: [Jruby-devel] Re: PATCH: Various fixes to make RubyGems work, almost

2006-03-26 Thread Charles O Nutter
Agreed on all points. The two hacks for IO=== and rescue returning the exception are, I believe easy enough fixes. The latter is an interpreter issue, so I'll tackle that, and I think the IO=== thing is just a matter of findign an appropriate way to define it. Once I have those modified and test ca

Re: [Jruby-devel] Re: PATCH: Various fixes to make RubyGems work, almost

2006-03-26 Thread Thomas E Enebo
Great! I could tell yesterday when I was playing that gems was getting close. Some of these could be landed right away and others not. My guidelines: 1. Can it be tested in a unit test easily: a. Both <=> with nil fit this category b. String.oct 2. It is not a hack. I think the hacks are

[Jruby-devel] Re: PATCH: Various fixes to make RubyGems work, almost

2006-03-26 Thread Charles O Nutter
Rubicon looks pretty good.On 3/26/06, Charles O Nutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The attached fixes make RubyGems setup.rb complete succesfully...but there's a catch.During the install of the sources-0.0.1.gem, two odd things seem to be happening:- sources-0.0.1.gem is modified, and corrupted - t