On Thu, 06 Jul 2006, Charles O Nutter defenestrated me:
>
>It's possible since I made that change that we've switched to the
>usually-more-correct CRef class, which could easily make this change
>unnecessary (and incorrect). We may want to do an examination across
>the board to see
It's possible since I made that change that we've switched to the usually-more-correct CRef class, which could easily make this change unnecessary (and incorrect). We may want to do an examination across the board to see if the RubyClass stack can be eliminated completely...it seems to be mucking u
I applied both patches in new codehaus subversion repository.
The eval patch is a little scary, but I am all for code removal.
The patch does not seem to break WEBRick, gems, or running a rails
app. Unit tests work. Charlie originally put that in there but
perhaps we made a change which now mak
I will take a look at this soon. The eval fix makes me scratch my
head a bit, but it is possible we do not need to push a class in that
case anymore.
-Tom
On Sun, 02 Jul 2006, Nick Sieger defenestrated me:
>
>The new, rewritten routes implementation in edge Rails gives JRuby a
>run fo
The new, rewritten routes implementation in edge Rails gives JRuby a run for its money.1. It exposes a missing Regexp.union method in the current implementation. Patch and tests attached for that.2. It uses Object#instance_eval to create special ActionController::Routing::Route#generate and #rec
