I think one of the biggest issues was the limited access to our own repository. Where with SF.net we can download a full repository dump any time, Java.net requires us to jump through hoops. We need to host JRuby stuff somewhere we know we'll always have unfettered access to all of the project's "i
On Apr 13, 2006, at 9:20 PM, Charles O Nutter wrote:
Codehaus has stated they have a place for us when we want it. Tim
Bray also suggested Java.net, though it doesn't seem to have the
features we would want. We'll figure something out after JavaOne
and be switched by mid-summer, most likely
Charles O Nutter wrote:
I'm willing to host it in the interim; I've hosted plenty of other
sites anyway.
Are we talking about hosting the domain, or hosting the project? If the
domain, one option is to keep it at GoDaddy and just let them forward it
until you make the move to the new servers
I'm willing to host it in the interim; I've hosted plenty of other sites anyway.On 4/14/06, Thomas E Enebo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:On Thu, 13 Apr 2006, Charles O Nutter defenestrated me:>>Codehaus has stated they have a place for us when we want it. Tim Bray
>also suggested [1]Java.net,
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006, Charles O Nutter defenestrated me:
>
>Codehaus has stated they have a place for us when we want it. Tim Bray
>also suggested [1]Java.net, though it doesn't seem to have the
>features we would want. We'll figure something out after JavaOne and
>be switched by mi
David Corbin wrote:
And thanks for the donation
Hey...I'm just happy I can actually make a contribution ;-)
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile
Codehaus has stated they have a place for us when we want it. Tim Bray also suggested Java.net, though it doesn't seem to have the features we would want. We'll figure something out after JavaOne and be switched by mid-summer, most likely.
I could probably take ownership of the domain, but Tom migh
On Thursday 13 April 2006 08:21 pm, John Wells wrote:
> Charles O Nutter wrote:
>
> Btw, curious...where are you going if not SF?
I don't think it's final, but Codehaus was suggested. Tom and Charles are so
busying working to get ready for JavaOne any real work towards it (like
evaluations) hav
Charles O Nutter wrote:
I think we'd definitely be interested in using it, especially since
we're considering a move off of SF.net. We've had people ask why we
don't have it registered already, so your contribution would be most
welcome!
That's great news...wish I could help with coding curr
I think we'd definitely be interested in using it, especially since we're considering a move off of SF.net. We've had people ask why we don't have it registered already, so your contribution would be most welcome!
On 4/13/06, John Wells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi guys,Very pleased and excited ab
10 matches
Mail list logo
