This is definitely looking better, but I wasn't able to apply the patch locally because it was mangled (probably gmail's fault). I'll look forward to the updated patch.The big motivator for this has been Rake, which wants to launch external interpreters to run test scripts and whatnot. If we can ma
I saw you're going to fix the last remaining issues, but I'm going to have a look at the patch tonight. Anything that cleans up my hacks will be an improvement.FYI, if you send patches in the future try to attach them rather than including them inline...some of us use email clients (GMail) that ten
On Apr 4, 2006, at 8:47 AM, Thomas E Enebo wrote:
Thanks Marc,
Sourceforge has had a major CVS outtage and I am waiting until
it is back
up to look at this (since I would be able to uncommit it anyways).
If you
end up fixing that last rubicon test by then, then feel free to
send ano
On Tue, 04 Apr 2006, Thomas E Enebo defenestrated me:
>
> up to look at this (since I would be able to uncommit it anyways). If you
Can anyone describe the learning disability that leads to sentences
like this? :)
That should say since I would be unable to commit it anyways...
-Tom
--
+
Thanks Marc,
Sourceforge has had a major CVS outtage and I am waiting until it is back
up to look at this (since I would be able to uncommit it anyways). If you
end up fixing that last rubicon test by then, then feel free to send another
patch.
CVS is supposed to be back up tonight or
