Ditto for me on the IM, though I'll broadcast all my channels here:AIM: headiusmaximusYahoo: headiusGMail/GTalk: headius ([EMAIL PROTECTED])I'm occasionally on FreeNode IRC in #jruby and sometimes #ruby-lang.
On 4/10/06, Thomas E Enebo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Charlie and I IM'd about this and
Charlie and I IM'd about this and he is looking into setting this up
for the immediate future.
BTW- If anyone wants to add me to their IM, send me mail. Charlie
and I have been IMing for a while now and it is helpful.
-Tom
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Charles O Nutter defenestrated me:
>
>If
If it would help, I could set up an anon CVS server on headius.com with a nightly CVS dump temporarily. I know we've got some good contributors out there that are hamstrung by the delays at
SF.net.On 4/10/06, Thomas E Enebo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Grrr.-TomOn Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Charles O Nutte
Grrr.
-Tom
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Charles O Nutter defenestrated me:
>
>The SF status page mentioned that anon CVS would not be updated for
>some time after their total failure to ensure that the new project
>server was working ok. As of today, their status mentions corruption
>
The SF status page mentioned that anon CVS would not be updated for some time after their total failure to ensure that the new project server was working ok. As of today, their status mentions corruption and shows further delays to the anon server updates. The full status of the CVS issues up to to
Well the anonymous CVS is prone to do this on occasion which is
seperate from the cvs downtime. We are very likely to move off
sourceforge this summer (too much to do before JavaOne).
-Tom
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Nick Sieger defenestrated me:
>On 4/10/06, Ola Bini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
On 4/10/06, Ola Bini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is great. I guess there is still major problems with SourceForge CVS,since there doesn't seem to be any updates in the open repository?I haven't seen any updates in anon CVS for a while either -- you guys are committing against the HEAD right?
/
I provided a zip file at:
http://www.tc.umn.edu/~enebo/jruby.zip
I have not yet commmitted your fast in/de/flater patch yet.
-Tom
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Ola Bini defenestrated me:
> Hi.
>
> This is great. I guess there is still major problems with SourceForge CVS,
> since there doesn't seem
imizations could get us some good performance at last.
> >
> > Regards
> > Ola Bini
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: Ola Bini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Saturday, April 8, 2006 11:27 am
> > Subject: Re: [Jruby-devel] R
was to replace a RubyString
> > with a StringBuffer in two lines which used append. I guess these small
> > kinds of optimizations could get us some good performance at last.
> >
> > Regards
> > Ola Bini
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > F
me good performance at last.
>
> Regards
> Ola Bini
>
>
> - Original Message -----
> From: Ola Bini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Saturday, April 8, 2006 11:27 am
> Subject: Re: [Jruby-devel] Regexp performance.
> To: [email protected]
&g
ese small
kinds of optimizations could get us some good performance at last.
Regards
Ola Bini
- Original Message -
From: Ola Bini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Saturday, April 8, 2006 11:27 am
Subject: Re: [Jruby-devel] Regexp performance.
To: [email protected]
> Ok, t
rds
Ola Bini
- Original Message -
From: Ola Bini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Saturday, April 8, 2006 11:23 am
Subject: Re: [Jruby-devel] Regexp performance.
To: [email protected]
> Once again, a very small test where I replaced the Pattern.compile in
> RegexpTra
Once again, a very small test where I replaced the Pattern.compile in
RegexpTranslator into a getPattern which saves all earlier patterns in a
hashmap. This actually worsens the performance slightly, so that's
probably not the right way to go. I will try to apply this approach to
the whole RegexpTr
14 matches
Mail list logo
