Re: [Jruby-devel] Removed devs not on jruby-devel

2006-02-09 Thread Charles O Nutter
Those seem like appropriate categories, and I agree on the areas that will get the most changes over the next few months. - Charlie On 2/7/06, Thomas E Enebo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We can provide some documentation at the end of the month under the > benefits of writing slides for javaOne

Re: [Jruby-devel] Removed devs not on jruby-devel

2006-02-07 Thread Thomas E Enebo
We can provide some documentation at the end of the month under the benefits of writing slides for javaOne. We also plan on changing how all classes are defined to the one magical final way. That will not happen until probably after May and it is unlikely that documenting those parts of the int

Re: [Jruby-devel] Removed devs not on jruby-devel

2006-02-06 Thread Zane Rockenbaugh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I've done a bit of developer oriented technical writing in the past, so was planning on sitting down one weekend and get up some basic documentation on how things work. I've been waiting for the structural changes in the VM to fall out before beginni

Re: [Jruby-devel] Removed devs not on jruby-devel

2006-02-04 Thread Thomas E Enebo
On Sat, 04 Feb 2006, Anders Bengtsson defenestrated me: > fre 2006-02-03 klockan 10:07 -0600 skrev Thomas E Enebo: > > In order to make our project reflect reality a little more I have > > culled our developer list. I removed developers who are no longer > > subscribed to jruby-devel. If I did

Re: [Jruby-devel] Removed devs not on jruby-devel

2006-02-03 Thread Anders Bengtsson
fre 2006-02-03 klockan 10:07 -0600 skrev Thomas E Enebo: > In order to make our project reflect reality a little more I have > culled our developer list. I removed developers who are no longer > subscribed to jruby-devel. If I did this in error, then let me know. > However, if you want to be